From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MO49C-0001EE-Cs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:27:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A625E074C; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11BE074C for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so1883634wfc.10 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:27:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=16Qcq09TWhSKLb8CWEYKPe+2VWHFskueik1Rzr3+9SM=; b=gLmdNuxlQg5xujqlcIKndgwep7fNR8gJoDWWl0i/rJ0qapATp7v4rFHlexXHhbPEZM UnEWl+z2KzF2xYI4UCBGTmsXcPRuYVto0SH8Fwo6fFL9Gv+BVcEeGJ6/6OQvLcxAcqRS Od31SOv5M7c/0eBsRHUXpPwDNzNqJA5XCgC8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NiwJ7uyFpj47M5vJavq25k+CLxeZb9PgpWTjjGwB66P/xR7BPplN2HbVFyOOPSzuzS OtnCAKMkc93jj2HBroIfj4JTR+HvE8YmobEmfcFMquSGTOC63jU+PUCYBPNW6LMNbdW/ W3x9xoP3HoJvqKcnpW5wnjWt1TYil8tKKNutM= Received: by 10.143.14.6 with SMTP id r6mr1713686wfi.24.1246948039969; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-98-210-6-40.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.6.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm25706327wfa.33.2009.07.06.23.27.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:27:14 -0700 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:27:14 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Andrew D Kirch Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Preparing profiles for EAPI 3 IUSE strictness Message-ID: <20090707062714.GD6719@hrair> References: <20090707000111.473a10bd@snowmobile> <4A52E641.9080403@trelane.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A52E641.9080403@trelane.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Archives-Salt: 09040cc3-1e5f-41f2-a9da-df9972970269 X-Archives-Hash: bbb3e0ffb85a2144faca9b628fd55d28 --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:08:01AM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote: > Ciaran, >=20 > I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or > PMS) in the first place. =20 No clue who you talked to, but they weren't speaking for pkgcore- I=20 speak for pkgcore pretty much solely. Pkgcore utilizes EAPIs- hell I=20 added the original support to portage. Not sure what info you got=20 fed, but it was a bit off. > I think that ending this discussion here and moving it over to a forum > more appropriate to package manager development would reduce the > temperature around your proposals and get them implemented (as Zac seems > willing to do so). I don't particularly care one way or another (subscribed to both=20 MLs), just mostly correcting one large misstatement... ~harring --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpS6sIACgkQsiLx3HvNzgcHLACg4pDpDRZN+H9UGRjOz7+XWreU Bl0An0MEs9tMe9EiXB6sYi5pBCoMZRkk =4Ofu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS--