From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MMOiU-0005Mq-50 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:00:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EF64E05F5; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304A3E05F5 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99DA651DB for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:00:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:59:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.30; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <20090701093158.9C33D64AC3@smtp.gentoo.org> <200907012027.23107.vapier@gentoo.org> <1246546965.6186.37.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> In-Reply-To: <1246546965.6186.37.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3330903.1WHlWTDGkP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200907021159.56801.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0dae7d7d-f934-41eb-bcc8-efa3ae2f6bfb X-Archives-Hash: e4f0a34d7915dd207d7e5b306292bb53 --nextPart3330903.1WHlWTDGkP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 02 July 2009 11:02:45 Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo > > in GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage > > forever): > > Only Gentoo developers may be nominated > > I'd like to add that requirement for proxies as well. Varied > interpretations of common sense seems to make that necessary. i'd keep them as sep topics as the first should go through quickly without= =20 discussion. the latter i'm not terribly sold on -- the understanding is th= at=20 a council member should have the good sense to only pick an appropriate pro= xy. =20 the definition of "appropriate" is of course up for grabs. ignoring the=20 tools, there is the possibility of bringing non-devs further into the Gento= o=20 fold (assuming the proxy is well versed in the topics at hand and not just= =20 "another body") ... then again, looking at the 4 year history, this has never happened, so it's= =20 doubtful it will happen. guess the proposal is fine. =2Dmike --nextPart3330903.1WHlWTDGkP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJKTNl8AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBECwQAKWT1GimyZCL3CQ2FjCyJEhx zkAp+OcxCuvnplmK3wqQICZ1CPga09i2EYUze0q2h6fEA/Z2B2WrLdimVBHSNlzT bVhjHUojWk++5kMnK9f/O5vPU59iN1832OFk+fVU6w7Q/gIbBsJzZnRiz8WezT9a 18dSrha+RdFF4PMaheHtB8cVM271b55Xjm7znE1uKHoOxoyHAq+KQ65q8SlPHtlg Rymm6WezAEDVrz4mhXZWgHfNkOzIJC6Hy3/LBWdUU4OL9T4omMUByYW1vtaZrehc nyQQPirJnWcxpQinMd/c3Znd9bzU1wE8+yXdxvf/jGvrrug58/l0wH4mkPBbDlU3 mEWQIbPNDe5s6AsS+/yjdZtcwU1iTR14UewOsAMsTPhImvaKV4BJwZxa+QioTRGy zjrETNvRZFSwcdiNOeJ6YfvAKNVbVQwk2N/40+HdO+d9eYopa3I7dE5rwpypuCdx i5TlnQ6D20F4jo3EKz71RCEN9iwWSZpUnTa0HwvwD4wevXCKsM6KolyWetUVdn3O wlLzrfgmegIJikNVr+VSYsdr46acssjtn0QcgyW8afMZqGzBI7YiMbzEFYdbCFM4 jskzko5gcX4LQyFmgUOwrK65qrWdG+ZG43ZKknlARfjW/7iSBDeVJreVGU6eCE1j 8v5EQGJ3cX9wKRl4LXRD =IoKc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3330903.1WHlWTDGkP--