From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MK5FJ-0007S0-9s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:49:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71066E0343; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22214E0343 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5Q6n9gq021124 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:49:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:49:06 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections Message-ID: <20090626084906.73b607ec@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <4A43E30E.4090100@gentoo.org> References: <200906252100.52295.wk@mailstation.de> <8b4c83ad0906251250k474d15f6vdef8f1afed8d2baf@mail.gmail.com> <4A43E30E.4090100@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: 9360e0cd-5f95-42a4-802f-1dfb068aba74 X-Archives-Hash: c82d18dda829ce51af7d757826c4abf6 On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:50:22 +1200 Alistair Bush wrote: > I would believe that recent history would show the opposite. There > seem to be a group of developers at which the mere mention of ciaranm > results in setting them off. Regardless of the technical merits of a > solution they seem more interested in just derailing anything that > might have anything to do with ciaramn. Correct. When he was booted off the project the last time, I breathed again and picked up my waning interest in Gentoo and it has thrived since. > I realise that ciaranm has had a nasty past. But recently I haven't > see anything. I for one hope that this continues and that other > members of the community take a look at themselves before spouting > about the evils of ciaramn. I have come to know Ciaran as an elitist little twerp and he is one of a few people in the world I wouldn't want to meet, or wouldn't know what I'd do to if I did meet him. It's really that bad, yes. The man brought it all on himself for the nasty things he did in the past and should publicly apologise for each and every time he offended someone in a web-e-vised 20 hour sorry-a-thon before[1] he is allowed back to do more than voice his opinion on Gentoo-held media. Thank you kindly, jer [1] Which isn't going to happen.