From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJv53-000503-Fr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:57:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6833E0498; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9443FE0498 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so2417554ewy.34 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=MAFd5Bh4HShDaleOwJIjx/49rIkMZG5ex92ytgK3e+c=; b=I5auv27SjlLZgp2a3KEaOnecPoS61JMVjEVgZhjTa8XDFoW8mJF4SAK2JEvgZ3BRQ/ oBqGNndmLLiduKh59346mooUtmD57SS/wT6Dg2CZyepxv4PKHk+sP+/XAJGYgWRZLpit GvMY/VYrlVXGk2erlJ8hFw4Pxb9KxTVLZwlrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=c4fNtNuSB2OzvEDlNIzfxNvkJ3m6nAbtAsHGyqO0xZG0+jbpchGTxDaPFclNr1Spyf 5M9kI5pqA9j9o8vgCh2otCtkyyfTr5IZ36uCX7p7C1/oct1zB4Rq3bbDsWfZs7n6D/ER mVcgXX17SJADuf8vryy3N9JDNFxyKP23BA4yY= Received: by 10.210.42.13 with SMTP id p13mr3271648ebp.99.1245959871788; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm613710eyz.21.2009.06.25.12.57.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:57:46 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections Message-ID: <20090625205746.287e9bc7@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0906251250k474d15f6vdef8f1afed8d2baf@mail.gmail.com> References: <200906252100.52295.wk@mailstation.de> <8b4c83ad0906251250k474d15f6vdef8f1afed8d2baf@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/_WfW/jYW246hkgCj8fv54Tl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ba480fd8-e528-4df2-8927-0daa8ec24e4c X-Archives-Hash: f3f101e95f66fcf1422a8dcf9f2bd6b4 --Sig_/_WfW/jYW246hkgCj8fv54Tl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:09 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Allowing him to proxy in a council meeting is both disallowed > (non-gentoo devs cannot be on the council) Please point to the rule that says that a non-developer cannot be on the Council, and please point to the rule that says that a Council member cannot appoint a non-developer as their proxy. I see no mention of either in GLEP 39, which only restricts voting of Council members to developers, and only restricts proxies to not having one person with multiple votes. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/_WfW/jYW246hkgCj8fv54Tl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpD1r0ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEwmgCfbKWJIFZFPWueXZckJO+cKlRs yKUAn2Gbx2PpsT0rYy621YkDVFc3V1Dm =1Fao -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_WfW/jYW246hkgCj8fv54Tl--