From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGJiO-0004ht-R4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BE13E0139; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075FBE0139 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOjw+sRFSd0IEJdSr X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p57A4FA7D.dip.t-dialin.net [87.164.250.125]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo42) (RZmta 18.40) with ESMTP id J021c8l5FKoEvH for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:27:37 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:27:40 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Newsgroups: gmane.comp.freedesktop.packagekit Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [packagekit] Inviting you to project "PackageMap" Message-ID: <20090615232740.244fd3cd@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A369D57.2030004@hartwork.org> References: <4A3206DA.3090907@hartwork.org> <200906151552.08793.rbu@gentoo.org> <4A367F08.3050209@hartwork.org> <200906152024.54418.rbu@gentoo.org> <4A369D57.2030004@hartwork.org> X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/1flcG6_9odMM=2mtkt/KFI9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 71f8b474-d625-4d91-abbb-5e9228f8fb47 X-Archives-Hash: 3be9b4dc03ad9d48f76a99708c1c5e3c --Sig_/1flcG6_9odMM=2mtkt/KFI9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Sebastian Pipping : > > I am convinced the project will be more viable if people can choose=20 > > their level of contribution. Many developers just won't care enough > > to take the extra hassle. >=20 > Agreed. However, I don't see a huge difference in level of > extra hassle. The most difficult thing is doing who's-the-vendor > research in my eyes atm which is the same at both ends. > Maybe collaborating at a central place can add some fun that > adding "some field I don't really care about" downstream cannot. I agree with Petteri here, adding the cpe information into our metadata.xml makes forgetting entry submissions to PackageMap really easy for everyone. Thus automatic extraction of information from your side from metadata.xml files should be one option to gather the information. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/1flcG6_9odMM=2mtkt/KFI9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAko2vMwACgkQNQqtfCuFnePzpwCgls+yqSYmCpOlYznt1/CPC0R4 MewAnj4mBYFbduxH9QvM2S/bXnX7IkNJ =D+3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1flcG6_9odMM=2mtkt/KFI9--