From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBrep-0006Ly-B5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:41:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53CEAE06A5; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B83E06A5 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arcarius.localnet (unknown [88.103.16.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9632865DD6 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:41:33 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_Chv=C3=A1tal?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New metadata fields Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:41:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4A268AE4.90009@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A268AE4.90009@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1649070.ExMqqvX5yl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906031641.17668.scarabeus@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 311be074-b544-409c-9c49-f46b88abb29b X-Archives-Hash: 1cc09296989d993ffa02d0ac395aaed3 --nextPart1649070.ExMqqvX5yl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dne st=C5=99eda 03 =C4=8Cerven 2009 16:38:28 Steve Dibb napsal(a): > I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we > would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think: > > Two things I can think of adding that would be useful: > > - ChangeLog URL > - Bug Tracker > > I know I hate hunting down the two of them, and both of them could be > useful references for developers and users. > > Plus, not every upstream has them, so they can of course be optional > fields. > > Steve ++ by me, those are mostly usual and i allways google for them. Usualy they= =20 are quite hidden ;] --nextPart1649070.ExMqqvX5yl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkomi40ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYckRACgol8AMrvQo9WMqXrSVWzAPRtX YiEAnRNu1KKYCym1LbCOtP5yjbRUd7EW =cfmL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1649070.ExMqqvX5yl--