From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MAhKH-0005lK-Qk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 31 May 2009 09:27:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 151A0E042D; Sun, 31 May 2009 09:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF4E042D for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 09:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 79.142.224.149.nat.router2.bolignet.dk ([79.142.224.149] helo=marsupilami.localnet); authenticated by wp165.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) id 1MAhKE-0005ml-Rb; Sun, 31 May 2009 11:27:30 +0200 From: Thilo Bangert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: How not to discuss Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:25:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.30-rc5; KDE/4.2.3; i686; ; ) References: <20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone> <20090530145613.37514ceb@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <4A21E40A.60500@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4A21E40A.60500@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2286016.yfjulcmVPv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905311126.00274.bangert@gentoo.org> X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;bangert@gentoo.org;1243762051;b5ef4ca6; X-Archives-Salt: 48562c43-d3f6-42a4-b1c1-13eb2f8f1b85 X-Archives-Hash: bc7d3e35b60e902626aa44b3918ba094 --nextPart2286016.yfjulcmVPv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Richard Freeman said: > Ryan Hill wrote: > > I'm tired of playing, as I'm sure you are. So please, > > let's be quiet now, and let the big people talk. > > This is a public list designed to facilitate discussion of gentoo > software development. Anybody with something constructive to say is > more than welcome to speak up - particularly gentoo staff. the thing is though, nothing constructive is being said. people are going=20 in circles. ciaran and co are pushing glep55 for reasons which they have=20 stated gazillion of times and nothing new is coming about. other people dislike glep55 for various reasons, but they clearly fail at=20 proposing a (better) alternative (a competing GLEP). while both parties claim thechnical superiority of their proposal, the=20 difference is what amounts to the colour of a shed. the arguments used to=20 support the respective superiority reflect that. please, please DO write a competing GLEP if you dislike GLEP55. it's late,= =20 but you might just make it... it is all too common in gentoo land to be against something. i want to see= =20 more people be in favor of (not necessarily the same) something. kind regards Thilo --nextPart2286016.yfjulcmVPv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkoiTSgACgkQxRElEoA5AnfdVwCcDLfBR1kIUB21xUg0vD1ZlkIE xOQAn2ZDy9azu7cbw80cPavsXRWs1pgw =TvgJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2286016.yfjulcmVPv--