From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9lW4-0000CT-08 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:43:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07917E03D7; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B560AE03D7 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so2017615fge.14 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:43:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=L18R/Z2QHxarumIj6T1nHbx4ya3DsD4Ce2aHUmuUtx4=; b=HJSZJx6WiIUZfKDWBFcRkPS6vP7isJHhFsoeDdaGqN/JjyHgrh5TtY2n2Ux+8kVGd5 LWIxWCltBSN/9Ff4UQYiNXmhgjuCOo/PUvD0/Y1tMBMuDo2k8V+0BcdfVHrTomJ3CKmp iHY36983bQo939RDxaaYxJ5M/8dnCv02cIAT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=pFv1Ij7dx9Ihwl2GoGCIqVoTPjRjpN/GSPc7uvigMhFhv1VuqVZyNhkCfw+IF74JSJ x/LJCmf122AyFzvIOqDODK+vp5mLW58ypcGSXd0/3b8cFLybFRoncYF5O0D1LCFALvx+ ADUMX72bWdG3uxCGpZLd7cik88EbK/fy2yGfE= Received: by 10.86.1.18 with SMTP id 18mr1940707fga.19.1243539830144; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm1470404fge.24.2009.05.28.12.43.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 12:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 20:43:44 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 Message-ID: <20090528204344.295f050d@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <4A1EE90A.5010007@gentoo.org> References: <1243489596.10450.24.camel@localhost> <200905282030.44496.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528194845.30a7c9ad@snowcone> <200905282119.35666.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528202643.0d763768@snowcone> <4A1EE90A.5010007@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/u5=0XOu5lCg+WaycXOo3yeX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d2cf9e3e-cfc6-42a4-9ca1-7ff541b9ad41 X-Archives-Hash: 56d31451514b7ca460f3cdf4a1cf342a --Sig_/u5=0XOu5lCg+WaycXOo3yeX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:42:02 -0700 Josh Saddler wrote: > GLEP55 has not effectively shown that there *is* a problem, otherwise > we wouldn't have had months of discussion on that topic. Uh. Did you miss the part where we need global scope changes in ebuilds? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/u5=0XOu5lCg+WaycXOo3yeX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe6XMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhF12gCfVK1GmsAYQygtxUA6vM43Lydv ijIAnRCY1xFaSUXhvJCKCuHnrhBV5FJJ =boBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/u5=0XOu5lCg+WaycXOo3yeX--