From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9l0c-0002xu-EE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:11:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7F4FE02DC; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E39E02DC for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 19:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so1511221fge.14 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=8EjHBjXFq8H1Uh9Ni6XbbdKdvBh4pi72deDUwnNXgTg=; b=BeC/vYUt27kz3Sz+eUzDbkfHV459ukE4jWuRBnAX0Tkwx1ft87e6FzGUBr7bn9MqQv BfYyjasnHjd/iLSuSTlJlFJnTpK8A/87s9U5OAoj5KtWACt2GvZDkxwTg1ETH8s+5h0Z +RpdgwH9GwPssIOSGLXLrybS5vQmfAGAsXFF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=CMXok8/s4D2Dt0fB8U3N32UxXcA+wyOfx/ECje+Fkz4uUfnSaig+Z+1Asz2BivXoVG cQ/tZ86KAOmsMluKH7e64y0ueM6rHBS0Yyy5G4ZLsd/GCYj4GsNfTXL2WLhpGtirZMfi jN6JxJ9KCl0BjoNUDNEueEq8rfDOiPjJLC6L4= Received: by 10.86.31.19 with SMTP id e19mr1911193fge.24.1243537879731; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm743504fgg.15.2009.05.28.12.11.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 12:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 20:11:11 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How not to discuss Message-ID: <20090528201111.56a9c17b@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200905282049.54434.patrick@gentoo.org> References: <20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone> <200905280828.13024.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090528191457.21ab4546@snowcone> <200905282049.54434.patrick@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/073Cnw0metegpOGHAzvw2DL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6c124b75-2419-4817-ada7-58a5e565ba5e X-Archives-Hash: c70d1ab596ac45dbf4ed0e3f2f211ae9 --Sig_/073Cnw0metegpOGHAzvw2DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 May 2009 20:49:54 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > Now you may still think (subjective thing, that) that glep55 is the > best solution. And I, with the same subjectivity, think it isn't. GLEP 55 shows that other solutions require either a design-enforced performance penalty or remove the ability to change how versions are handled. This is not a subjective matter. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/073Cnw0metegpOGHAzvw2DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe4dUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFckQCeOQidgu1K14CteRNqDlmM9i1q vjEAni8Qk6DNcUvO4KNb2vFL0G5bExuq =8Jue -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/073Cnw0metegpOGHAzvw2DL--