From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9SxL-0005pj-8w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:54:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21DE7E041F; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC2E041F for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so1790018fge.14 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:54:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=qie9XWNepcBE2xGds9zPiVA04OATPNHMUebqqPijuaY=; b=Qfk71Ekew0wvOybosWJxKcBcoVIaEbsSqd1FfTs77IJPtkARAcuH+4s7+D4l3PBNqa 7lMxB/YbGY3mhXOexOwHdLLunkRRbVKE/g5M4f4GSFXIIvyDjVi80M1z5MecA/QhgLm4 9tzQCg3f7iq4VLjgNVD7IAd99cmezCG3aUNsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=j49xPodF5X+szGUwGKTxd3zHhStkbZrsBzpGRPf6LLtSEafk1zxwCI4CPtr/uhGXBv ubInNx/WuB+f9co4t/JWtumJiFiy5F1n+MIGfpqEunOt8k9dmmYWRN4BsnLG8U2lwjxB lyM0GOn78p0YMu11tWhhlmaNIe0cf5oxhPmco= Received: by 10.86.26.11 with SMTP id 11mr860359fgz.45.1243468485301; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm3909718fge.24.2009.05.27.16.54.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 May 2009 16:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:54:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 Message-ID: <20090528005440.1663441e@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090528014834.4c6ec87a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone> <1243460607.3480.3@NeddySeagoon> <20090527225229.6be38c58@snowcone> <20090528004518.5a4f91b5@snowcone> <20090528014834.4c6ec87a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/U1GPVFuA+Rii5.adAogxSpX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6949ae86-6a02-49d7-a554-4738586bee92 X-Archives-Hash: 19998902b57b209d49d04b87eeaa67ec --Sig_/U1GPVFuA+Rii5.adAogxSpX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 May 2009 01:48:34 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:18 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 +0000 (UTC) > > Mark Bateman wrote: > > > NOT once within GLEP55 [...] >=20 > > Not once has there been an equally good alternative proposed. >=20 > None needed, seems to be the major voice. So it's your opinion that Gentoo should go with an in every way inferior solution that doesn't solve the problem as well? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/U1GPVFuA+Rii5.adAogxSpX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkod0sIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEabQCdEHfGaVst8YByoQf+qjfBhI4b I80An2Pnx87c+z2ZwP0lzB6nSQRHz1qs =3Ev8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/U1GPVFuA+Rii5.adAogxSpX--