From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8yt6-0006op-E6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:48:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A941E0339; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f175.google.com (mail-bw0-f175.google.com [209.85.218.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BC8E0339 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so3506190bwz.34 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=w3pBJ2iMSkoSA/jdNbr45DwWZaVEcLP77SlOHR/zJHo=; b=xi0NjcbiLktIJLFHD9ouH8DGVoFk3XI8/EQTuielsLQ6xmdVNLBatckbgp8BFBU7ov kcpQ1q+1p4bF79s+KPEcS7coyzo867mozhSbI6IbvHQuOMcrgjyWXrNqwGCQ0wXZJMyi KLc1xcRjebqOQo4yN3QDnRIKc8wb6UazydBk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=BHIUey47M6lyAg2m5QksjeYVrLdkV1azrsYf6/9n9DFemJGXdYUQCDn5vaSEY8naxb 12KQ+/3NtkSkzU+J8IPE5cb4QMNhyxHhA3UwL76Ro1NxqacDhyB80JA0R+BOqsaqPZFQ WWTDDbR4eTS4kY6hrbNzQcy1OUPnMY7FQM2Oc= Received: by 10.204.56.4 with SMTP id w4mr8302123bkg.25.1243352902008; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homeboy.localnet (ppp-94-66-187-127.home.otenet.gr [94.66.187.127]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p17sm25960fka.28.2009.05.26.08.48.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 May 2009 08:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Theo Chatzimichos From: Theo Chatzimichos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:48:18 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.28-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.2.87; x86_64; ; ) References: <18971.38030.314626.857360@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20090526151710.GC11826@gentoo.org> <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <4A1C0B45.1000805@allenjb.me.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905261848.18295.tampakrap@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 619accd1-022e-4aaa-955b-f53e09670da2 X-Archives-Hash: f7112c89543b9871c70e7df16584c2da On Tuesday 26 May 2009 18:31:17 AllenJB wrote: > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. > >> We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category > >> (eselect itself would stay in app-admin). > >> > >> Opinions? > > > > I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary? > > I have to agree. app-admin is hardly among the largest categories. > Perhaps we should consider splitting up the 400 odd packages in kde-base > (kde-graphics, kde-admin, kde-games, etc) =P > > As for app-admin-eselect, I'd favor tags over increasing the category > levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time > (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways). > > AllenJB kde-base is OK please don't touch :) Also i removed one package from kde-base today :P -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE Team