From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8L3U-0001RK-2F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:16:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84AC4E03BC; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dev.gentooexperimental.org (dev.gentooexperimental.org [81.93.240.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F120E03BC for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lolcathost.localnet (xdsl-87-79-177-16.netcologne.de [87.79.177.16]) by dev.gentooexperimental.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912EA62A888 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 23:16:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:16:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.30-rc6-git7; KDE/4.2.87; x86_64; ; ) References: <200905171820.27340.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <2994439.2hv7UABkEb@news.friendly-coders.info> <20090524214352.13c3bf30@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090524214352.13c3bf30@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905242316.13712.patrick@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3e981d8a-4086-4776-9412-511c246df25d X-Archives-Hash: edacffcb4eccdad7f9c9864ec9c98d22 On Sunday 24 May 2009 22:43:52 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Here, this sums up what's wrong with most of your cockamamy ideas (as > > attractive, and oh so right, as they may seem to you now): > > > > http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s07.html > > > > To paraphrase you: Go and read it and don't come back til you've > > actually understood the concepts. > > Sorry, you don't get to post that kind of response until you start > being right. In light of you being wrong (see above), please apologise > and retract your remarks. Ciaran, this mailinglist is not your personal playground. As you obviously can't even be bothered to reflect on other peoples statements without reflex-posting something unrelated I must ask you to stop spamming us. It's just not funny anymore. Okay, yes, Mr. Long was quite rude there (trying to fight fire with fire I guess). But in this case you're discussing rather subjective things again (how often is it the case that you don't have a cache?) that might not even be a problem. And, as you consistently don't read any arguments that might interfere with how you want reality to be, sometimes people use harsher language in the hope of making you read (and maybe even understand) their argument. Now please stop playing the drama queen, stop spamming (yes, replying to every mail is spamming) and maybe we can return to a technical discussion, as this mailinglist was originally intended (or so I hope). Thanks in advance, your friendly neighborhood kitten.