From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8L9K-0003KC-6L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:22:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48F2BE059C; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A004E059C for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so479185fge.14 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=ChgSPB10iDm70sZxQiDItfgtKnX5ZZuULNd8fD1s+fc=; b=TC9LQQmzo6F59Y8zgvfWF0s0LKfzSoVNzR7leIrAz+UoAeyVtrEoRpc8eQljv7KN69 ls494XNK+qrXv32+is2wdkQGWTlv3iqiAAdQbpHAcfox0X4UWPUGUMDs/mv68ZIa7PtX vQUL+66v/RzSuaWPBZzybHV4gxUta0AT7gAN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=jHgTCNTVlcY4fANmSkTIw1nOiQCfdBEiuSTzbZAIUHufdzya29aquPNINMyQZrARIz PDMLbTg7xNghBiGHNaPeZ7GsWl0uUbM3Yiv5Z41rwpGJZrrTF9l6sJMHneuOIHPHssBe 13CXhnQRtUC19yr7JetAEXChuuR6uW/MZnWS0= Received: by 10.86.4.7 with SMTP id 7mr5110001fgd.46.1243200148330; Sun, 24 May 2009 14:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm9294697fgg.28.2009.05.24.14.22.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 24 May 2009 14:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:22:21 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI="3" ebuilds Message-ID: <20090524222221.59172272@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200905242316.13712.patrick@gentoo.org> References: <200905171820.27340.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <2994439.2hv7UABkEb@news.friendly-coders.info> <20090524214352.13c3bf30@snowcone> <200905242316.13712.patrick@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/pcmMxQOKQyh0PLe9GE6SF2O"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ad6d455d-f7d4-4fe1-b3b3-9ffd55507f44 X-Archives-Hash: 3efcd590118d278179bd5afd21204ef5 --Sig_/pcmMxQOKQyh0PLe9GE6SF2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 24 May 2009 23:16:13 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > Okay, yes, Mr. Long was quite rude there (trying to fight fire with > fire I guess). But in this case you're discussing rather subjective > things again (how often is it the case that you don't have a cache?) > that might not even be a problem. This is not in the least bit subjective. You don't have cache: * for any overlays you use * often enough for the main tree that we get people asking about it in #paludis, since Paludis warns if it encounters stale cache files. We know full well that this is a real problem. Stop pretending that it isn't. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/pcmMxQOKQyh0PLe9GE6SF2O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoZupAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGYAgCgoGra3juhybOp1LtGh8s/eNl4 30gAnAvQf9pLEAd7uOwsMJB14MuQPa6l =3t/u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pcmMxQOKQyh0PLe9GE6SF2O--