From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M64yu-00043s-PB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:42:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B1A3E0327; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.goodpoint.de (tori.goodpoint.de [85.10.203.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A54AE0327 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rbu) by mail.goodpoint.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97995108545 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:42:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Robert Buchholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:42:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20090518161646.2c29b637@snowcone> <20090518172800.7576c34a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090518172800.7576c34a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3597309.O6MmkLG0Fh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905181742.21333.rbu@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1f23da65-61ff-4fe2-ad51-46dce4b06e75 X-Archives-Hash: 6d6a638b6165f3b11408fd81504a45e2 --nextPart3597309.O6MmkLG0Fh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 18 May 2009, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:16:46 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Why do you think I wrote the awful hack that is versionator? > > Why don't you explain why, historically, you put that in the tree? It > would help us now if you were to simply record your mistakes for > everybody else to easily avoid. It's still being used in the tree and > should be discouraged. I'm not following. Why should it be discouraged?=20 I was happy with it until now. Robert --nextPart3597309.O6MmkLG0Fh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJKEYHdAAoJECaaHo/OfoM5OuMP/0J6GLPYsS97MWSeGcdEog1I sOmYOsQG2bdCULgDRUUWwYniRmoyLUf2jbfScTOE/au5LKXz5aVffLI5kDUupFfI xraAHYOAbixAxXjAUbw9eDcMtD28xkJngXVhDHBOZnQ/mMzCq85LWJ+ExS3cHogS CgI8cbuHKONQOmmNT5BC4mQ2wojOA/eYmFsyQcHSbNSgHMf/AMUCMTb1J8gTR4X0 V+tyeETg1KtJatTNeRRmqNX8xrc4vd+lWi0Q1CpRnL9lvir8Ze4H6/O+hUm3ZLLG BnM+EcoOdRaHZvQA5/TqEG9Hc2ByLFl5UNs072FqvWyBmuCw429M91tBmqw5kfl6 iOtI4qosiXyqSqXr4vLNC5+WEoIPFdz44a/rHe98ZFkSsvhhqbhpjdUTQSjea4fg KMdpcvL1kJegfrIiaZ6VPu827uwqtRlZ1IQuJrA0s32tyBcJwD082iDFIy0w5IZl cwF7gbI8aiLza33mneBHJ0vwRvcWgJUqPoxc8+PeMD+osUKJQ6taFYCD0VbGCS9z FweeQsT/m9/cqLjjfbXaRJUT9f+CNoXqsGrTrHcNnAGuhOvi4xSjCRdcUmxCR8vz numdbjhd89XWl3F+NxOC8B2plgG8b86ZPQSCbFu1oO17YGZCHHmxf0jDyCHmtDw6 hAuHwz7rmtQqDBe+Y8zq =Lsha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3597309.O6MmkLG0Fh--