From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5lZF-0008Ik-FZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:58:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB328E03CD; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B363CE03CD for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F02F64DDB for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.131 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.131 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.468, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gTPOBmDDDBi for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764E964FAC for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M5lYW-0005CA-56 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:57:52 +0000 Received: from static24-89-92-122.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.89.92.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:57:52 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-89-92-122.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 18:57:52 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:59:48 -0600 Message-ID: <20090517125948.4cf58726@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> References: <20090517121524.5a6f19e5@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <20090517191814.23290515@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/OqIvsgD1nNLd14qxYH/OcWl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-89-92-122.yorkton.accesscomm.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 0387ed20-797d-4a62-b766-257f952ede93 X-Archives-Hash: f75ce78909cc5897ca0737d98e4c2acc --Sig_/OqIvsgD1nNLd14qxYH/OcWl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 May 2009 19:18:14 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:15:24 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: > > I'd like 2 if we could have multiple same-versioned ebuilds of > > different EAPI. 3 is good enough for me. >=20 > We couldn't. Allowing multiple equal but different ebuilds gets highly > crazy -- EAPIs aren't orderable, so it's not obvious which one the > package manager should select. Ah, right. I knew there was a reason. --=20 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/OqIvsgD1nNLd14qxYH/OcWl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoQXqQACgkQiqiDRvmkBmKeTwCfXCSI2GTosjFwq5pfmjZ3mD5N aaoAnRDAtSIWaTNdKTJLskc1L5A11vXt =Pz8H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/OqIvsgD1nNLd14qxYH/OcWl--