From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5OOe-0001zy-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 May 2009 18:14:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30811E0688; Sat, 16 May 2009 18:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4BE0688 for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 18:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so2387034fxm.34 for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=MTW4kP8Egr5ZXWHPO8UjVQFhee6TaEBwwQKHgsSo4G8=; b=FoLr3zt/57b/bvb2pmqDH5OkPaB6RfEZ5Gu1cwY4fom1zLDJOzK0h1vF5YXvD0YvLw rTGrUdNR52VOLJ+Sq6l738qNWKD44sRpspiRPDjWXruRDvI28KBEHCaA1+wbjKg5Soyi 3lI0XHod/R7dEG/A8xbupVMuqDqJkAvLuCuNY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=fYHXZqZdk90ovwujBXtAg8U3P55OptIs3xpk6jAZB2fzxr0S/aLACgdMnnahSCDVLJ 5CmIKHR/0UFQ1f7sYb3RAM28olNXJsILSk4BmD/N88JYKrCg5qM9jn0Q8guwmy7jq+O1 wNlztpCz/Qv0i7lvLNSsUynT9ZGEYZPJVZpno= Received: by 10.204.59.145 with SMTP id l17mr4757650bkh.28.1242497646184; Sat, 16 May 2009 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm4356659fkd.3.2009.05.16.11.14.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 16 May 2009 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:14:00 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Message-ID: <20090516191400.2a435f3c@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20090516181007.GA8308@linux1> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090515204905.54aa6a5c@snowmobile> <4A0E8717.5070600@gentoo.org> <200905161059.53706.levertond@googlemail.com> <4A0E9F66.1070508@gentoo.org> <20090516181007.GA8308@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JTwzsduli7oVxtstTkmZgn6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 851c6f45-6c29-42e3-bef7-7fcad6d93235 X-Archives-Hash: 3cdd173e3197ad3500587a8836105f3f --Sig_/JTwzsduli7oVxtstTkmZgn6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 16 May 2009 13:10:07 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > Agreed. The way I have always usedEAPI is, you set it once at the top > of the EBUILD and you are done with it. As far as I know, there is no > reason to change EAPI once it is set, and eclasses shouldn't be > changing it. But eclasses have tried changing it. This is something people have done, not some hypothetical. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/JTwzsduli7oVxtstTkmZgn6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoPAmoACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHELACgx8j0j2jVzYn8tL2uG8JeVn4E 84UAn11uvbZtwnVCwPLpQzyUYLjzoNKY =Yw4X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JTwzsduli7oVxtstTkmZgn6--