From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-35808-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1M4rsj-0005Q7-HK
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 May 2009 07:31:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23FB4E04B6;
	Fri, 15 May 2009 07:30:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com (mail-ew0-f165.google.com [209.85.219.165])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD61E04B6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2009 07:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2272231ewy.34
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 15 May 2009 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        bh=OwQVMIk31fzg1ZyRGTt9Q9RMZq4Wanq9Hompux8g6iU=;
        b=oZThEjCw1gK03yIGX7wu9QFGG5h+0e9DIGfTsFHd5788O6S6DBIUUoudZPxU1+oGUb
         oxODgvKxmF2jWL9L2E59EQIJbJq3ME7Vtt0Bu8dEiPkozRq0MzR8LMN3lSpYkqx3m1na
         g3JjzKV9cdAVAYYdRqGjZhFoBMEIp+1Aq/rd4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :message-id;
        b=RH7AC6bQnZ8/PSSlXzRlLtf3ci1gQVFbt3rVMnv8LAUihy9DIdEVPiw0p1qfLsJrmj
         zXhM+okO66iXXEwGHLnzhupLa+eEpwYkxwD3sGL31pUosXpDplrAaBUP0iSBg5nwUuoU
         XvUEgC3kS4BET08nGJUXVysg/C+4To3AfCBbQ=
Received: by 10.210.87.14 with SMTP id k14mr3762698ebb.97.1242372658375;
        Fri, 15 May 2009 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.2? (5acc3399.bb.sky.com [90.204.51.153])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm1274051eye.6.2009.05.15.00.30.56
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 15 May 2009 00:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Leverton <levertond@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:30:54 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514193907.56754ae6@snowcone> <4A0CC889.2070704@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A0CC889.2070704@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200905150830.55047.levertond@googlemail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 130decd8-b0eb-4a16-bb6e-0ab5934c9faa
X-Archives-Hash: 3e4c02d502ed81f93bf520fe9d09fe13

On Friday 15 May 2009 02:42:33 George Prowse wrote:
> Having countered those four points I guess you agree with the other five
> then. Over 50% success rate (by your definition) is hardly being
> ignorant or trolling

In that case we can assume that Patrick agrees with all my counterpoints, 
since he hasn't responded to my email at all.