From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4ggl-0000GH-HX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:33:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85818E07BB; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f175.google.com (mail-bw0-f175.google.com [209.85.218.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AB2E07BB for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1452670bwz.34 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=p7PmcBvXwfwNx2aKOx2fzqJvyj1DY0imLyT0nnW9yxA=; b=cRdqt7x7g2e5IESMD4lcka4K7XOAmD/YAwW5zDjB+2GH4N4yko8DrhWqHvUGKYfMnY LGxYvl6FSAYCTlndET0EkxlBgT01D24BEBaOR51INp1cRNEjZTVQRLnW+CEnhjxQnvqz e/vltGlQzI8q5b2Q1D15DlkIK1YTvew7K1LwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=jC/F0iv2IOUiUU0nQDNviYxg4B/DE5VBlGjdNAQaW01JsH+a3bLyWkeonFhlsGZO+L 9dbmA7DbYm4Fm1kn1BE5+tTQfdshBmrmXXKOILtVdoIamX/92XrpwlcA56PQJDCbTytU v+InnyFS1MFSMJZwCvb5rLFWOngdalkOepDvM= Received: by 10.204.58.9 with SMTP id e9mr2451946bkh.23.1242329633439; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm623574fkt.21.2009.05.14.12.33.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:33:47 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Message-ID: <20090514203347.4e82ef6c@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200905142124.14702.patrick@gentoo.org> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <4255c2570905141217uda219cbp19a6160493e35c62@mail.gmail.com> <20090514202018.7464a2dc@snowcone> <200905142124.14702.patrick@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/8ZMZNHlnZEHftnXulXOBqbT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 5cdf1bc3-e63e-4d5d-9b06-9aad852f524c X-Archives-Hash: 0553c24ca7a92c857752f54599e1ea2f --Sig_/8ZMZNHlnZEHftnXulXOBqbT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:24:14 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > "so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" > > > > There's no possible way that can make sense. Whatever he's claiming > > by that is obviously nonsense. >=20 > Ah. I was not precise enough. >=20 > Let me rephrase it in less ambiguous terms then -=20 >=20 > "Having EAPI in the ebuild is slower than having it encoded in the > filename" >=20 > Counterpoint: No, you use caching if it is that darn slow Cache it where? There's already a cache, and introducing any new cache will only slow things down, not speed them up. And you still haven't justified how glep 55 makes it slower. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/8ZMZNHlnZEHftnXulXOBqbT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoMch4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG/AwCeJ8UeIXUtwGIBrX6xDvbTJNjN fiEAoLG/Ne0J0/8DQ0QvRwsSFauDjnuX =MsjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8ZMZNHlnZEHftnXulXOBqbT--