From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4gTk-0005sa-Cu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:20:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6261FE0575; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23175E0575 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1452274fxm.34 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=SCXGJ5b1w/4pvZjzRvI41jfWL1nCanMj6UGmmtHwbro=; b=KHnujLkC74qaPgh/HSsynBMHxZAA6JR8Pzf/xaEsUIKeZUmz19ZjsuUpV43veQ3NlZ 7wkJU3iyjZbq6q23ac7C7r779fLZuPDZh81DPHXGF1uW36E805AUUm8rNQwnMBah/PCF 0rMhiNxr6NWGFmOi2gvwSgf6oWW6eFEcmFv0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=iQRoHsP6d7tzWVQbooJRkNKtUzL3ouDeUvX/sVTV9q1PijRNP9pNesEdoH8W2EL4Ho YsMvJfQpVCRA9fYeG7bREVD5m+/nPmLwbNKdZtmhFT26zx3i9cGU8QApgCGwN5wlAz4w +WugqlFrptvDEupxKCHd26xdORF+TvwjU/4rs= Received: by 10.204.57.81 with SMTP id b17mr2388271bkh.212.1242328826422; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e17sm601128fke.13.2009.05.14.12.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:20:18 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Message-ID: <20090514202018.7464a2dc@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <4255c2570905141217uda219cbp19a6160493e35c62@mail.gmail.com> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514193907.56754ae6@snowcone> <200905142105.53027.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514201130.64f39316@snowcone> <4255c2570905141217uda219cbp19a6160493e35c62@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/qFKI3Imnip32k7PXqOPBPr."; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 2d449a9f-baca-4857-afea-13451e8fe10b X-Archives-Hash: 532148a819a662c7857b0f45d9b062a8 --Sig_/qFKI3Imnip32k7PXqOPBPr. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 May 2009 13:17:24 -0600 RB wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 13:11, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: > > Please explain why you claimed GLEP 55 makes things slower. Until > > you answer that, it's hard to take you for anything other than a > > troll. >=20 > Hell, I'll explain. Read paragraph 8 again. Slowly. Read it a > second time, since you obviously didn't read the first time. The > paragraph makes the point that the pro-GLEP55 stance says that > encoding EAPI inside the file is slower. It is not saying GLEP55 is > slower, it is attempting to debunk the theory that it is faster. "so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" There's no possible way that can make sense. Whatever he's claiming by that is obviously nonsense. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/qFKI3Imnip32k7PXqOPBPr. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoMbvUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHChgCgnF5OySngMV2x1ajOEYB8s8zj AYEAoMBSyrRSNgKdKEVvEYsfAaP/WQqA =ZAfo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qFKI3Imnip32k7PXqOPBPr.--