From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4gRM-0005Jp-42 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:18:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F49E0771; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1736E0773 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so1451056fxm.34 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=oAVzjd3T8KMaLWIcbROLIZJNJJQ7t+HNtzXHJKaI6qU=; b=PHsenvNi2+jmKOkBT+ZgdKeYgH0SvDArCMOWqbuMUsjsCzcCVLYAStAnomYgoD6zZi VVJ+IvEd/9v04MaEfg3yZvOi/1FrrlJGgkX/WAUVGyVEI4IoeyQV4NbzbHKp89GFsFZb ddF2fttshGhkFdB0yM7Qj7kQcfxy1Waie4E8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Z9JPyq42q35dl0iJ4kPQCQXWlvMG457BGiSjEOXmePQUQnVcIQ1S2Ri1FV9RWDHrGq T11qz6biIpUNvIN4/zs1u+rkamtOB9C2fpJJri0XCEeC3t3ASZV0GDMVnb4CiG2q+PJn Z359DJSEU3z8gMrn72/hBqX5F43jwxC8J7miA= Received: by 10.204.101.2 with SMTP id a2mr2389832bko.104.1242328678082; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p17sm600764fka.15.2009.05.14.12.17.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:17:49 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Message-ID: <20090514201749.5b8883c8@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200905142109.58809.scarabeus@gentoo.org> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514193907.56754ae6@snowcone> <200905142109.58809.scarabeus@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/=zr8BVN4pw/_PKMiuRohnzb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 12d3a6c8-a1f6-4749-a57c-bb98130f8c20 X-Archives-Hash: b203f6d50918375d2cb18f4ab583e4b8 --Sig_/=zr8BVN4pw/_PKMiuRohnzb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:09:58 +0200 Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > Dne =C4=8Dtvrtek 14 Kv=C4=9Bten 2009 20:39:07 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > > Where on earth are you getting the idea that GLEP 55 makes things > > slower? The only difference to the code with GLEP 55 is in checking > > file extensions against a slightly larger set of strings, which is > > nowhere near a measurable increase in anything. You're claiming that > > checking for a suffix of either ".ebuild-4" or ".ebuild" against a > > fixed string is in any way relevant, which is obviously trolling. > Read the block once more, he is not stating that adding suffix to the > filename is slower. He is stating that GLEP 55 makes things slower. I quote: "so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" The only possible change to GLEP 55 performance-wise is in the file name recognition, and that's so obviously not an issue that there's no way anyone can take it seriously. Unless you seriously think he's claiming that GLEP 55 does away with the need for storing EAPI in metadata cache, which is even more obviously nonsense... Either way, he's trolling and needs to be called on it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/=zr8BVN4pw/_PKMiuRohnzb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoMbl8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEEBQCeLch7jjfwqOIKjl/aq/4vquaJ iRIAoNyWqGN1Ei4Yojt4efyPvi28/ke1 =+7TK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=zr8BVN4pw/_PKMiuRohnzb--