From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4gLN-0004be-Qp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:11:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 309B1E04D3; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4568E04D3 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so523729fge.14 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:11:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=SSPCIvlaOeVT/12lTx2qgRAdmM88ZFlNlRXaYIBKnhw=; b=gUa0Y13k8TBF+wQkkYIrEaqO/H9o39ghIAqjcJ4EUswdGILKNtXW6GxzrFCVMP/we9 wzUkhNTDlrV+3Uo7Q1rokxqaP0vMV0fAztlZ5rDkWstTsBOGl2woRfyYvzFK9bJHNOh/ SduIIQjae7HTqANh2sI6qJwi3s5s271XBmWWo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=jhigmpWY1VNw6WInAfa1sTRM5+ukzHudv4xmU75oS/tD20b/Vr++pg/r78Vcef6GeE 9E2NHVZjiFnJYBFFBU5hWcKtEIrebj3sTEq5TIwEF6Vf8Nt/YY3mTN8a0Ja9u1GnRmre i36n4pZrhm8LBwyOQRCn2RmqCSkz+KMlH8MAk= Received: by 10.86.59.18 with SMTP id h18mr2818379fga.71.1242328298148; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm640316fga.4.2009.05.14.12.11.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:11:30 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Message-ID: <20090514201130.64f39316@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200905142105.53027.patrick@gentoo.org> References: <200905142006.51998.patrick@gentoo.org> <20090514193907.56754ae6@snowcone> <200905142105.53027.patrick@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/c8nzyek8_0FrPRxGOJUaQi9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ae63c5fb-3675-477e-9458-8bfec190347a X-Archives-Hash: 32edb3c7e90dc75b3d8ecdffc01495cd --Sig_/c8nzyek8_0FrPRxGOJUaQi9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:05:52 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Where on earth are you getting the idea that GLEP 55 makes things > > slower? The only difference to the code with GLEP 55 is in checking > > file extensions against a slightly larger set of strings, which is > > nowhere near a measurable increase in anything. You're claiming that > > checking for a suffix of either ".ebuild-4" or ".ebuild" against a > > fixed string is in any way relevant, which is obviously trolling. > That is quite definitely not my point. I mean, hombre, did you even > READ my email, or do you just apply prewritten text blocks in the > hope of solving issues like most "technical" "support" does?=20 Please explain why you claimed GLEP 55 makes things slower. Until you answer that, it's hard to take you for anything other than a troll. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/c8nzyek8_0FrPRxGOJUaQi9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoMbOUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFyZwCeL6IeYGCYGbozPlkkI6HKhYNQ wh0AoMekB8tfl1P1AFLJmORKjQdhNhnf =+WSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/c8nzyek8_0FrPRxGOJUaQi9--