From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M4fpW-0007Kd-Bx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:38:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32A18E0516; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.148]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5476E054C for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so374326eyw.10 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:38:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=Vywm90NQ2hPOY6oRgDNXOFI9aiC/zYCxsjapKrnov/k=; b=SD9qen/HjWw2D/zp/X7Q7J1xxn/5w6I6sJrOe3NITwRYEo0Eh514t0jXncMAH6fmnl ofXgTraoLKgqpd6UaBWtWeCUdXhI8WnJF4xy7iPb81aG2yvBvn3uehyrVPwBhM7PRvk+ RQI4B6cyCMNKvFB0xd+D7U7QMEemuOMThKudE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=X9TGoyMNR6gfKObPPlKGTFpXOdz5e0+tLyLA+yJxM+qlIFnMkhYkGZtOMkQ9JJRRv2 U5WgXcywp629a1eLVyrNmgH2ua0QbclxQJP7auivvdduMLffioTER994X5rGx1y6jchS puUL29y/GLIjFc2MvJwSsQzLCXdnXrwGspb24= Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr2064433ebb.5.1242326332231; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm437155eyx.43.2009.05.14.11.38.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 11:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:38:46 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots Message-ID: <20090514193846.5d1cb24f@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <6EC3E6EE-F8BF-42F4-90F1-DEA00B628D09@delirium.ch> <1242215007.1403.2.camel@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/id0lq6Q0kh2K3oHwtWxGclK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 7caa6467-e796-494f-8a00-b188d86366a0 X-Archives-Hash: 44d4e941947fbde1c3f00272003a4dbe --Sig_/id0lq6Q0kh2K3oHwtWxGclK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Sven wrote: > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes: > > FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, > > since it >=20 > I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never > mind. Do you know where EAPI changes are discussed? (Google and the > Bugtracker didn't yield a useful reply.) The best way is to make a carefully thought out proposal, mail it to this list and it'll get picked up. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/id0lq6Q0kh2K3oHwtWxGclK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoMZTgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGPzACggg6Z+MaY4fs7qb45rH1doPFP epQAoLMouKmvKX47k6BpNy2qQvSB3BfA =lLWv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/id0lq6Q0kh2K3oHwtWxGclK--