From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3OFV-0008O9-OP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:40:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20DF7E032E; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D0FE032E for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-98-246-79-112.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.79.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E68654C2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:40:21 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: pybugz command syntax Message-ID: <20090511054021.GC7834@comet> References: <20090510153305.GA13462@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090510153305.GA13462@linux1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Archives-Salt: 0ceb545f-a49e-4e7f-bf5e-8420519025ed X-Archives-Hash: bf3f8ac5b6d83eb4dbeb677d1a713bac --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:33 Sun 10 May , William Hubbs wrote: > All, >=20 > I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something > similar to the way portage's syntax works. For example, "pybugz get" > would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to > simplify the command line parsing code. >=20 > Does anyone have an objection to something like this? I rather like it as is, because pybugz has distinct "modes" with other=20 options that are only valid in specific modes. I don't really find it=20 user-friendly to both specify a mode of operation and options to that=20 mode with the same syntax. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkoHukUACgkQXVaO67S1rttmiwCg5C7h4VgfV6GiGd8Sr0UDRYLR w7wAoO0rf5f5aDCeUnunt3bVBXF3xpNq =AO5C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7--