[gentoo-dev] rfc: pybugz command syntax

[gentoo-dev] rfc: pybugz command syntax

[William Hubbs]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,

I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
similar to the way portage's syntax works.  For example, "pybugz get"
would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to
simplify the command line parsing code.

Does anyone have an objection to something like this?

- -- 
William Hubbs
gentoo accessibility team lead
williamh@gentoo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoG87EACgkQblQW9DDEZThCCwCfY237fQy5GqcaRKSjWo2vLlTq
RSUAoLTEj/Xh0tx/hqtrAU7pStbgQ46O
=x1oN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: pybugz command syntax

[Donnie Berkholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 729 bytes --]

On 10:33 Sun 10 May     , William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
> 
> I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
> similar to the way portage's syntax works.  For example, "pybugz get"
> would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to
> simplify the command line parsing code.
> 
> Does anyone have an objection to something like this?

I rather like it as is, because pybugz has distinct "modes" with other 
options that are only valid in specific modes. I don't really find it 
user-friendly to both specify a mode of operation and options to that 
mode with the same syntax.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: pybugz command syntax

[Christian Faulhammer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>:
> I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
> similar to the way portage's syntax works.  For example, "pybugz get"
> would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to
> simplify the command line parsing code.
> 
> Does anyone have an objection to something like this?

 You will break app-portage/gatt.  But I can deal with that. :)

V-Li

- -- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoIhvgACgkQNQqtfCuFneNKzgCfaoaZrtuwYqgiUdJdy54RZzNX
Y5gAn2LQW2CVVAsTvg3fWH80b5uYB7xM
=7MEL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: pybugz command syntax

[William Hubbs]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:13:44PM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>:
> > I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something
> > similar to the way portage's syntax works.  For example, "pybugz get"
> > would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to
> > simplify the command line parsing code.
> > 
> > Does anyone have an objection to something like this?
> 
>  You will break app-portage/gatt.  But I can deal with that. :)
> 

Actually, it has turned out that I didn't have to make this change, so
gatt should be ok. :-)

William

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoIjPQACgkQblQW9DDEZTg8rQCfY4qQ9dEUHFnKX9VjU0Z2u1CP
bxoAoK5wK14uPbIcBi7QXBH4t/hvK6dR
=AmLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----