From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M35Wv-0008At-K9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:41:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDFEAE01CF; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com (mail-ew0-f165.google.com [209.85.219.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18AEE01CF for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2784935ewy.34 for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 02:41:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=279rc77JxmFmSDRnCTpkUhfghHWFPTwS0u9aIsu3FxI=; b=UrhlveO6u2DobNd8CCP7zN+8KdZCprZTVR8YwVBRQ1cn7Uuv1IeDD9ziUKoiFkA7gX oQk5ns+YQvq+D1F50fq1bkhJCO/tof1zpsEozuDt1jpCyPofjJPjoXv4SKZCBmYl5ObH vJw4Ft6x4uLuW3h5yRaARoAzGdvocaD8xwdAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=lT1nQ/MyJR+wl0UwugRKtA3j8BiIRxsba3rHkJ3K+RFYHpts7wCu1D/sLWVbV09hGV ezoE3XKWr45z8SanVUE/N+SYXZuLXWkPU+oPBrYkQfVFS59F38RFJYMnKNbgTfCSxHoj HSq8Dcdtfah+SRjSwdiON7fuLLk6Fwd/4SNSY= Received: by 10.210.92.8 with SMTP id p8mr3499296ebb.6.1241948467176; Sun, 10 May 2009 02:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? (5ad0d224.bb.sky.com [90.208.210.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm5367065eyd.52.2009.05.10.02.41.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 May 2009 02:41:06 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-cdr/cdrdao: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20090510020017.6fb85f71@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <20090510025822.1cb8dd1b@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> In-Reply-To: <20090510025822.1cb8dd1b@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905101041.04091.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 29b8996c-1d91-4473-8030-acee73690c2d X-Archives-Hash: 3007b3b47918e1da10474a830141fe13 On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600 > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific. > > Actually, am I right? Yes. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239671#c10 gives a better approach for this particular problem.) > There's a crapload of stuff in the tree doing > things like this and worse with FEATURES. Welcome to Gentoo.