From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Retiring
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:02:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090504180224.24c9133f@snowcone> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905041936.09010.hwoarang@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]
On Mon, 4 May 2009 19:36:04 +0300
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Or pushing more and more EAPI's will?
>
> No... As I said before Gentoo is quite understaffed. First we need
> people. Then we can concentrate on features :)
As it happens, a lot of the features that go into EAPIs are designed to
help with that. They make it easier to write good ebuilds (and harder
to get away with certain QA abuses by accident), possible to write
ebuilds that are less annoying and possible to write ebuilds that cover
things that could not previously be covered. And, looking at it the
other way, Gentoo has lost a lot of good people because they weren't
prepared to put up with EAPI stagnation.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-04 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 21:26 [gentoo-dev] Retiring Peter Faraday Weller
2009-05-03 22:51 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Duncan
2009-05-04 11:47 ` Ferris McCormick
2009-05-04 13:05 ` Duncan
2009-05-04 8:34 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Markos Chandras
2009-05-04 11:36 ` Peter Faraday Weller
2009-05-04 11:50 ` Ferris McCormick
2009-05-04 12:35 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-04 17:48 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-05-04 18:24 ` Richard Freeman
2009-05-04 19:09 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 13:50 ` Richard Freeman
2009-05-05 14:06 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 16:18 ` Tobias Klausmann
2009-05-05 16:26 ` Sergio D. Rodríguez Inclan
2009-05-05 16:36 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Duncan
2009-05-05 16:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 16:51 ` Robert Bridge
2009-05-05 17:03 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-05-05 17:07 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 19:06 ` Sergio D. Rodríguez Inclan
2009-05-05 16:26 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-05-05 16:41 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 16:52 ` George Prowse
2009-05-05 17:05 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-04 15:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2009-05-04 16:36 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-04 17:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2009-05-04 17:06 ` George Prowse
2009-05-04 17:23 ` Mario Fetka
2009-05-04 19:11 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-05 20:45 ` AllenJB
2009-05-05 22:45 ` Markos Chandras
2009-05-06 18:32 ` Peter Faraday Weller
2009-05-06 18:40 ` Roy Bamford
2009-05-06 20:41 ` Peter Faraday Weller
2009-05-06 21:28 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Duncan
2009-05-06 21:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Retiring Markos Chandras
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-29 2:34 [gentoo-dev] retiring Chris Brannon
2010-06-07 20:26 [gentoo-dev] Retiring Maurice van der Pot
2009-05-04 18:06 Mario Fetka
2008-02-04 21:18 Kevin F. Quinn
2008-02-04 23:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090504180224.24c9133f@snowcone \
--to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox