From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:35:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090316233530.503e9229@snowcone> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903170026.40842.scarabeus@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1918 bytes --]
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:26:36 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Why? It was an official EAPI agreed upon by the Gentoo KDE project.
> > Having it there is helpful for package manager people, and removing
> > it would just mean more work when features make their way into
> > Portage. Besides, if you really don't want to see it, you can just
> > make it all invisible with one easy switch.
> >
> Actualy now people expect kde team to manage support for kdebuild
> too. So it is not such crazy request.
There's a lot of kdebuild-1 stuff still out there that the Gentoo KDE
team created, and that users used because it was the best option at
the time. You can't pretend it never existed. And remember, a package
manager can't correctly uninstall something unless it knows about the
installed package's EAPI.
> > We've been over all this before. Unless you have something new to
> > add, kindly avoid wasting people's time.
>
> And you are not wasting others time by flaming all around glep 54. I
> dont mean i dont agree with the glep i just dont agree with your way
> promoting it. And if you say i dont have to read all the long flame
> around you dont have the right saying somebody else not to write his
> ideas on this mailing list.
There has yet to be a decent technical objection to kdebuild-1
being in PMS. There has yet to be a decent technical objection to GLEP
54. Anyone going around objecting to either without bringing new
material to the table is either trolling or hasn't done their homework.
The nature of Gentoo management is such that any unanswered objection
is treated as legitimate grounds to stall a proposal indefinitely, even
if that objection has been answered ten times previously. I really
don't want to see the Council sit around and not approve EAPI 3 until
we have the whole kdebuild discussion again.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-16 20:47 [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-16 22:59 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2009-03-16 23:09 ` Rémi Cardona
2009-03-16 23:20 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-16 23:26 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2009-03-16 23:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2009-03-17 0:05 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2009-03-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-17 0:46 ` Thomas Anderson
2009-03-17 4:07 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-03-16 23:22 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-03-16 23:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-03-16 23:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-17 2:47 ` Ryan Hill
2009-04-23 5:32 ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-04-23 6:05 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2009-03-17 4:45 ` Luca Barbato
2009-03-17 6:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2009-03-17 8:15 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-03-17 8:57 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-03-17 13:55 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-17 15:11 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-03-17 15:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-17 8:21 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-03-17 7:50 ` Peter Volkov
2009-03-17 8:05 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-03-17 8:19 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-03-17 13:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-17 13:55 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-04-09 1:12 ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-04-09 14:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-04-09 16:20 ` Mart Raudsepp
2009-04-09 16:25 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-04-11 18:56 ` Alistair Bush
2009-04-11 19:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2009-04-09 16:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Patrick Lauer
2009-04-09 16:29 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-04-09 17:13 ` Richard Freeman
2009-04-09 19:24 ` Tiziano Müller
2009-04-10 10:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2009-04-11 3:54 ` James Rowe
2009-04-11 10:57 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-04-11 12:09 ` James Rowe
2009-04-11 19:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alistair Bush
2009-03-17 15:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2009-03-27 9:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Fabian Groffen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090316233530.503e9229@snowcone \
--to=ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox