From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgoLz-0007eB-Fx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:53:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94C98E0580; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f173.google.com (mail-ew0-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCFEE0580 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so900776ewy.34 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:53:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=inwekRNc3SfuQ2BoIAiXTusstvg+U8OvXWdiNDaQol0=; b=u1SwpJx6WATi5iypAm7IkW3w0xkvmIc/acGsFhis2oaP4JPsNyf5qhZrhROgyF6DhU /KQUdBgf2MXoWmPsgZvEyYljgwvyOvNAV4Q8hIcaq15KXYJMnlZU9HcqRdyhtxYt/lSg p+8kclmiZjML/hq5LQN1pIocSOw9NCw8yQGqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=tcm0ReEzS32n/tn8E5V3sCLc4/QHGlNLhT6+Z41iR1m2Qi/j8aRxIRTO/BCjLRJbJd teed3Q7mgLSb5ak1a7ycy78MdRazEf4Axnt4kEVkcBoxf6EkZv8bkCiw/dQ7nuHt+Axo f4CHPXDJkq47oyMXCLvA5izbg2WYGXR+zqESI= Received: by 10.216.1.69 with SMTP id 47mr2361685wec.224.1236639225459; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1sm8408029nfh.56.2009.03.09.15.53.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:53:34 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3 Message-ID: <20090309225334.3187cf40@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20090309223941.GC3444@comet> References: <1236498557.6854.51.camel@neuromancer> <20090309202624.723e4b2a@snowcone> <20090309223941.GC3444@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/bA42jDBcyuC7RhJaA7=dU_K"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a3fdad8e-2791-49a8-91d3-075e0f529770 X-Archives-Hash: db511c111856cfbe8b1f98ed696936e6 --Sig_/bA42jDBcyuC7RhJaA7=dU_K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:39:41 -0700 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > * Calling unpack on an unrecognised extension should be fatal, > > unless --if-compressed is specified. The default src_unpack needs > > to use this. >=20 > Why? Currently, if a package does an explicit 'unpack foo.bar', where .bar is an unsupported archive format, unpack just does nothing. This isn't a good default behaviour; if a package really wants something to be ignored silently, it should have to say so. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/bA42jDBcyuC7RhJaA7=dU_K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm1nfIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGx9gCgsWlBg+w77ns1wkJZaRVdq3xC jKQAoIaKaaGDFpmFRRbWwGYMII++nLPW =24nH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/bA42jDBcyuC7RhJaA7=dU_K--