From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgMAh-0001Yh-N0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:48:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8F0DE039D; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f173.google.com (mail-ew0-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6E2E039D for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ew0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 21so532172ewy.34 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=3DtrZxNCOSQv2u8Toru5DuUg0rgMEKcEDc13sLVJkpM=; b=lQnOvktLOZNYuRuplhOXT5T508EeDfMPve+sIO8ABpkdph546iiqWCjEFPSrAwvzgo 6EPfP7E5HUY5plVnes7VY4yYjqCP1NdwMH/vWeJvVdUQDZG5q+sTWUMBvayVFpWhSZXy vurJPnTIGKAWuoXh2aMjZ/tk57wDB5OrjCRas= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ucQkS9n55QBMmzQOZQfpCJeIbSewO2LRRHiNySheTNaeAZhSKArsiSvhv497WeHmqB MXDSmlVoPW7xlEuep+7/tLckSpsTF2CqPd+hk5pTLTWrNadCyACDLpyh3th1pfmGhmQ7 DfYKBaQa/pA/iA2ce4Afn2R+mhUdgThkVEdtw= Received: by 10.210.86.10 with SMTP id j10mr1757708ebb.41.1236530894196; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm5942292nfc.51.2009.03.08.09.48.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:48:06 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3 Message-ID: <20090308164806.1d3fa1d7@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090308164228.GG14240@comet> References: <1236498557.6854.51.camel@neuromancer> <20090308164228.GG14240@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/xjPcnTXaJbafcrHRt0K/OQb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: efd1ca47-475d-4527-8662-799f2f37f01c X-Archives-Hash: 84961153afb1d25640a5a113178df7f9 --Sig_/xjPcnTXaJbafcrHRt0K/OQb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 09:42:29 -0700 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > - I understand the reasoning for the SRC_CONFIGURE_WITH blah stuff. I=20 > strongly oppose this implementation because it makes ebuilds less > like bash scripts that are easy to understand. Instead I suggest > extending use_with() and use_enable() to accept multiple sets of > arguments (alternately, making custom, similar functions that will > take multiple args). How would that work? I can't see an obvious way of doing it that isn't more or less as verbose as just using multiple calls. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/xjPcnTXaJbafcrHRt0K/OQb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmz9sgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHuSQCgqQvUm4wno7u5cunVjn00asYd gBQAniDC4e1qO4HQxa0f81umJ32fbgpK =e6Ez -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xjPcnTXaJbafcrHRt0K/OQb--