From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgENr-00076Q-W4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:29:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8A80E05EB; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 08:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62981E05EB for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 08:29:18 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQvVOjw+sRFWdUIEL9b+ X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from terra.solaris (p57A4D4BB.dip.t-dialin.net [87.164.212.187]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo11) (RZmta 18.25) with ESMTP id 000947l287AEhs for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 09:29:17 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 09:29:36 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3 Message-ID: <20090308092936.404f9be4@terra.solaris> In-Reply-To: <49B37D05.50206@gentoo.org> References: <1236498557.6854.51.camel@neuromancer> <49B37D05.50206@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/PYgiJE.hb_frZoPjK43pAMU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 9fe34c00-be3a-4fca-8efb-2dce9cafcd68 X-Archives-Hash: 0b5cda3b96a5b68e76a5f0e5d250af85 --Sig_/PYgiJE.hb_frZoPjK43pAMU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Josh Saddler : > Tiziano M=FCller wrote: > > Hi everyone > >=20 > > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of > > new problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package > > you depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an > > example). > >=20 > > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct > > improvements: > >=20 > > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=3DpPAJXP6shYH78lCXeqRqCUQ >=20 > Is there a reason why we should ram through a new EAPI for something > that *looks* like another "Paludis supports this so let's make it a > Portage standard" proposal? Is there some kind of time deadline here > that you all want? built_with_use supports exactly that with the --missing switch and yesterday I noticed some ebuilds that could not be transferred to EAPI 2 because of that. > Also, why the bannination of || ( foo? (.).) -- how is it error prone, > exactly. I would like to hear about that, too. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/PYgiJE.hb_frZoPjK43pAMU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmzgfUACgkQNQqtfCuFneNbvACgnX1A/u99I57ydoox6XsV3Dx3 l+sAn3yDwsaKlxEXTf3hZ+Q6/qJBVOPI =hyWg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/PYgiJE.hb_frZoPjK43pAMU--