From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LfubO-0003xi-Gw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:21:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 630DAE0227; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3.laposte.net (out4.laposte.net [193.251.214.121]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF5AE0227 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meplus.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf8307.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 59BD67000086; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:21:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from ? (91-165-140-59.rev.libertysurf.net [91.165.140.59]) by mwinf8307.laposte.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0EF9F7000081; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:21:55 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20090307112156614.0EF9F7000081@mwinf8307.laposte.net Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:21:55 +0100 From: Nicolas Sebrecht To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work? Message-ID: <20090307112155.GA12948@vidovic> References: <1236132096.2522.4.camel@localhost> <20090304125051.GA12901@vidovic> <81bfc67a0903062322w5063cae4x47af801be8df44d4@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0903062322w5063cae4x47af801be8df44d4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-me-spamlevel: not-spam X-me-spamrating: 40.000000 X-me-spamcause: OK, (-100)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrvdekuddrudelucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuoehnohhnvgeqnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecuucdlqddutddtmd X-Archives-Salt: b47099ab-dab6-4835-8624-cb463cf81846 X-Archives-Hash: 885af5e91fb19bb3d71a9e12a96936c2 On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:22:00AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht > wrote: > > Give a git access to the developpers beside the current CVS ? > > or replace cvs with git... oh and you can replace rsync too... because > git is faster there as well. Provide a git only access today is not serious. Some developpers may not want to learn/switch to git. It could be a long term goal, however. I'm not thinking of internal tools efficiency. It's all about workflow. Also, rsync just do what it has to do the right way. Git does not fit to that kind of job. -- Nicolas Sebrecht