From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeI2i-0000P1-Jz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:59:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A483EE047A; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f173.google.com (mail-ew0-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4A0E047A for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so1851342ewy.34 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:59:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=k9XDLVx7LyxjNkbFLurruALwrlcwYTX2EzQMBpMaai8=; b=tpzi4FXlfg5z9PelgSXxbbiTrsle8y/vcEfS7f59qOYNqkDmS0WhjJN2WL4unfhnuI tP2rv81i49cHJ5XZ/r7uO5+Fvad7p1sNdAInIVKOct2N75rlcapyPod00/e5KihRVEcY 6KHvZVYCQ4UTDuaSuSy8E05hvVPPJlTSO+L0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Tb6kCk5AG+kLFxjpCHXoqMIaKDHJroJyITBcbwZN5clu3Oa2URbyiAMaTl/dZFDAlo Dph37Z3iqPBSeHC5S5VmS9/1Qob2o2/oWxG6dgKPPWdSlv7v6Y9i1DU/KaCfMB0xHOmu oovx23liGwEy/GD85TQtBvNjDfb3W3pzkOoXI= Received: by 10.210.139.15 with SMTP id m15mr3640973ebd.84.1236038365630; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9sm503248nfh.22.2009.03.02.15.59.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:59:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:59:13 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays Message-ID: <20090302235913.21375f90@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <1236038139.19392.6.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net> References: <1235702483.8324.38.camel@localhost> <20090302164807.6324266c@snowcone> <1236038139.19392.6.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/BXN4xKT7n2YB_.nEv=g6tmb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: f359dab9-9a55-4436-8e4b-5c6306649bc7 X-Archives-Hash: 380c8057fec4ac0aaa97f589a46ee892 --Sig_/BXN4xKT7n2YB_.nEv=g6tmb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted > to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24 > components that were masked or using masked packages in > base/package.mask so we just made sure those packages had the proper > keyword visibility. So if you could mask 'testing'ish things that're in the overlay (already possible), and provide an easy, consistent way for users who choose to to unmask and keyword a particular group of packages, would that solve the problem? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/BXN4xKT7n2YB_.nEv=g6tmb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmsctkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHJkgCdHDCkfPwKWN14d8Q4Gk9s8MVE t9kAoLRF6NzgxKjLaSIMUl6Y7cyQgtXq =Mcxc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BXN4xKT7n2YB_.nEv=g6tmb--