From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeB32-0001oF-N7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:31:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 266A5E01CD; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EF0E01CD for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-98-246-79-112.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.79.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8636564603 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:31:15 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.use in profiles and IUSE defaults Message-ID: <20090302163115.GF1955@comet> References: <18859.48379.586872.678277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wtjvnLv0o8UUzur2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 5e73c4b9-d3e2-4b00-a687-fa75c8708e92 X-Archives-Hash: d7dd96279675891ceb187378c45678bb --wtjvnLv0o8UUzur2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:27 Mon 02 Mar , Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >=20 > > Is it safe to remove an entry from package.use (in profiles) if the > > package has an IUSE default for the respective flag? > > > > To be more concrete, Emacs ebuilds have IUSE=3D"+xpm" now, but we still > > have an entry "app-editors/emacs xpm" in profiles/base/package.use > > which I would like to remove. As I understand it, the two methods are > > adjacent in USE ordering, so nothing should change for users? > > > > Ulrich > > > > > Correct. Assuming the user has an EAPI=3D1 capable package manager, which= at > this point in time they really should. If they don't, then they won't be able to install emacs anyway since all=20 its ebuilds have EAPI 1. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --wtjvnLv0o8UUzur2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmsCdMACgkQXVaO67S1rtvDagCdF90VMKOM+9Uw8XNtShbXzazw E/gAn0vny+opXm6Z6hnBdxqj+6oz5YW2 =W/L2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wtjvnLv0o8UUzur2--