From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdV9I-0008Rj-EF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:47:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78712E02BA; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.145]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F70E02BA for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so367889eye.10 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:46:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=1Q6UL3I0MNTt0o2svazq0XYdK0c+ixh4YS2u7Pnc9x8=; b=gpC9/9SufB1YNXkVBlXFyzKFJn9NePj0FOJO8TaLtUH8QCR3VztvLo5lCBYQIhqU2V r6wK3XkYe/LBl6lxdsW1+lD1S4PUIctwmS4/cRSlFlT049sa4u96f6Hbdt7i0Tyms8Cc emd0tU1bD67+Yz9rRhC2Sz/CE4VZIS5qsApRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=n8joMeRu5Q2J1p/rAgVUIcSq7GE/i86wAL5BkkhHaSkRRcpg0TVQlGjTlU1aKhrcVn O085eZ0DQgrIaitqxGVA90CubMK9zKT9mePpnKc6SFp8ksxoize0HvBRgLDRCXEazRKq qVwpjAymoUedfeDk73ilwc871lus8ygk8weYo= Received: by 10.210.39.2 with SMTP id m2mr3159472ebm.36.1235850411826; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:46:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm540922eyf.32.2009.02.28.11.46.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:46:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:46:45 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Message-ID: <20090228194645.11af4c5c@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49A992F8.1040109@robbieab.com> References: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> <49A992F8.1040109@robbieab.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/oSy.mOVB59s4dogvkFYtots"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c59e0d03-f09c-42e0-943c-abb6be253c1a X-Archives-Hash: 68ab09649aa73ba2f94eec0d634be4ed --Sig_/oSy.mOVB59s4dogvkFYtots Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:39:36 +0000 Robert Bridge wrote: > I have been thinking about this specific option. I will admit I don't > know if this has already been noted, but would this create the > possibility of multiple ebuilds with the same $C/$P-$PV? GLEP 55 forbids it. Note that it's already possible to have multiple equal versions of the same thing (1.0_alpha0 equals 000001.0_alpha-r0), and it's already illegal. None of this is altered by any of the proposals. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/oSy.mOVB59s4dogvkFYtots Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmplKcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhErQgCgskahoA8tpT85iBWFJbI/Ss1a xf0AoJJJwVOsn4BkDWAzb44jutfsb8oA =rgBT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oSy.mOVB59s4dogvkFYtots--