From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdCiK-00069N-SH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5204E02F4; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EEAE02F4 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anaconda.krait.us (unknown [74.93.222.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D4464390; Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:05:42 +0000 From: Ferris McCormick To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dragonheart@gentoo.org, trustees@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] truecrypt licensing - bug #241650 Message-ID: <20090228000542.38002e6b@anaconda.krait.us> In-Reply-To: <200902280934.13331.dragonheart@gentoo.org> References: <200902280934.13331.dragonheart@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/IKtCGjxQCq7suYevpT12.F1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4cf08faf-63a1-4448-9611-0474a97df9f1 X-Archives-Hash: 7b0c5ae79b3ec7835b314ac8784b4e4c --Sig_/IKtCGjxQCq7suYevpT12.F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:34:12 +1100 Daniel Black wrote: >=20 > I've run out of interest to chase down the answer to the range of issues = here. >=20 > Can someone with a few hours look trough all the info and see if truecryp= t=20 > license has improved to a situation where it is not putting the gentoo- > foundation or gentoo user's at risk. >=20 > If you could provide a fully cited reply on the bug report. >=20 > Next step? Gentoo Foundation lawyers? >=20 > Sorry for the lack of interest especially to all those who want to use=20 > truecrypt in the time being. >=20 > Daniel Black >=20 I'll look at it for the trustees in a bit. Regards, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) --Sig_/IKtCGjxQCq7suYevpT12.F1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmof90ACgkQQa6M3+I///ctxwCgsIHeTOe3GKAKAUoXqQglDBrT Jf0AoL4/ghX7njCBvzI6eW35284EVSe6 =fyhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/IKtCGjxQCq7suYevpT12.F1--