On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19:20AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 23:12 Tue 24 Feb     , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so 
> > it's a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, 
> > cardoe, dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that 
> > they've taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere!
> 
> I'm not prepared to decide on the whole set of solutions related to GLEP 
> 55 yet. I need more time to think about them, and since new options are 
> showing up frequently, it makes that pretty hard. Here's what action I'd 
> like to see regarding the whole thing:

A delay would actually be useful.  Folks (outside of the ml) have made 
some claims that can be disproven/proven via prototyping a pm.

I won't get it today, but week or so should be enough to nail down the 
performance cases, backwards compatibility, etc.

~harring