From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcloN-000591-1F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0558CE0384; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com (mail-gx0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB829E0384 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1604064gxk.10 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:22:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=hFYbJKf1klQKV/+s8y6N2HUG5ChLXUWzrHX6eLsuXpQ=; b=WNCkeG5Cmxh7QRx5oD+RcSFPu6RSBWjnOYRl8edfuqdDf30N6vDy6sodZ+qlfhjWIL DlrP93JbaFwFugW5BYVH9rtH+UirspxzGSqvMyzeW/RnvZMdbpltTxZhOxBAFqn+8MT8 aQzkdj00/qw89MWVZ8hqv9nIejZsehkkq3hSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=NBuwNLxrive2g1eNN/VE7rqFhUyFcKogJgHbwWdT+I74ue0g77o1ZToqPSmnNWliuR dhisDmfreAgZKAi8i079FBTJQvzh+oGQ2nlZrUTViJmpthQxcqbuK+lqhe4IjQD8J3YP sTK9o5Dw5ZtK4EyQlh2axq1EASlnfbUoVJrVM= Received: by 10.100.173.18 with SMTP id v18mr1946929ane.20.1235676141150; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm8970568nfh.26.2009.02.26.11.22.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:13 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26 Message-ID: <20090226192213.30b2c0c2@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20090226191920.GB3820@comet> References: <20090223072648.GK12339@hermes> <20090225071235.GA3923@comet> <20090226191920.GB3820@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/lxq7Pl4w_YyuQdSaUWQsoeE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 60935722-c069-4ebc-b4a2-0f7745060273 X-Archives-Hash: 37e0e3bcad7ff3476eaf68b96d324057 --Sig_/lxq7Pl4w_YyuQdSaUWQsoeE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:19:20 -0800 > > GLEP 54: handling code from SCMs better > > --------------------------------------- > >=20 > > Some discussion on list. Luca, can you sum up the state of things? >=20 > Still waiting on a summary ... perhaps if Luca's too busy, our > wonderful new secretary could do something along the lines of the > above doc? Anyone but Luca please. Luca's been busy selectively ignoring problems with his proposal, refusing to answer objections to it and claiming it solves problems that it doesn't. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/lxq7Pl4w_YyuQdSaUWQsoeE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmm6+cACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGL4wCg5SVImLCkrFD55qyWAmoFdBTu ASMAn3BW1cAbAH1d5aLPQhw+DzqShiQu =yCfS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/lxq7Pl4w_YyuQdSaUWQsoeE--