From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LclP2-0001H6-JD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 864CDE0361; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DA7E0361 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so540931anc.1 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:56:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=mqP+OYpl34XsJ5w87bt3TcaGV/m18l3rUUeTJPus2h8=; b=MXWFfvK9StyleB+8CFUNOKfjHZs7QbAsnT2bf8zsQ1wZ55RvMU1d5icy/MEozdtXXw +89yZtJRKHW+v7YW2IlOxP5osWjdt8A3JDy2NYTMPPr//X+9NIVVCej/fKGy0VIyNIo/ Wc2La4AsJJYvnFhUXCF7MfBXD7lVm/2phNu78= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ttTesjFEHvm4qpGd1zLN0Col5LybHV6DIxUzxkxkPpd7/JyDmU4Ggess+4dNOWKv6V AA+T9AmEw/5hDGrmDuZPEGPj40gNNFL2oi+IV/Bu66TA6IvPNcM8hsfd9mA/wRMNslUC ZUa8NJHPAX4vL1AlQS6pSZH2CJh+GSVNipCWo= Received: by 10.100.240.17 with SMTP id n17mr697189anh.48.1235674570984; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:56:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f6sm9622930nfh.0.2009.02.26.10.56.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:56:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:56:02 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Message-ID: <20090226185602.7581156d@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0902261047o126a7ba5m9a45349ebf196733@mail.gmail.com> References: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> <20090226180732.5c95a0ca@snowmobile> <20090226182024.0cd44cc8@snowmobile> <8b4c83ad0902261047o126a7ba5m9a45349ebf196733@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_//B5hUOXR8oTSuHLyY6ug4Ws"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: f9cdcfd6-d807-481f-8d7f-821337b23d9c X-Archives-Hash: 66e77f416f60e1be52b2fae3ce56a335 --Sig_//B5hUOXR8oTSuHLyY6ug4Ws Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:17:36 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Is the following a stricter subset of your wording? -- >=20 > "EAPI must be set in an ebuild as the first non-comment line, and > thereafter must not be set to a different value" No. With your wording, the following are legal: EAPI=3D$(echo 1 ) EAPI=3D${PV} EAPI=3D$( a=3D() ; a+=3D3 ; echo ${a[0]} ) --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_//B5hUOXR8oTSuHLyY6ug4Ws Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmm5cUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGhrACgq6wNoxYlfaOz+ApR8m+VxcNG KsQAn1B0bERRHPIYhJ+2C6S6t11foEwM =qwc/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//B5hUOXR8oTSuHLyY6ug4Ws--