Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA bashism check on portage

[Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

On Wednesday 25 February 2009 23:45:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
<cut>
> i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash
> supports, not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my
> experience is dated at this point.  otherwise, integrating it sounds sane
> to me, and if we can push fixes back to debian, even better.

It does not fail, the problem is that some construct works only on some shells 
or systems (for example type and kill -HUP warnings).

Maybe we should add a getopt flag (-q for example) to mask that types of 
warnings, or maybe we should (for Gentoo/Alt) adapt files to be (almost) 
POSIX compliant (so command -v instead of type, kill -s HUP instead of 
kill -HUP, and go on)

> a repoman check on files in files/ would be useful as well i'd think

Yes, as supplementary check

-- 
Timothy `Drizzt` Redaelli
FreeSBIE Developer, Gentoo Developer, GUFI Staff
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence.      -- Jeremy S. Anderson

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]