From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcUTm-0007kS-Cm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:51:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DD07E0343; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f175.google.com (mail-fx0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA0E0343 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so246809fxm.34 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:51:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=QCPSWtGRxCxm6ut5f12UT05JegN3YZ6PgRQHoACyePw=; b=Mvvf2fVFXpnTJ92cziTYKptEHoPGD1mAWUORkM6BTBnoYtQeW+DMft0UN6B7ruK/mK Xh8jbK3SrRRA7px3wuDTRNZ3/qYDJ6mLRW1BgcdUF8ALN08mmU0Ag22Qz+35zw1Xhfg5 Knv2av0bQH/rmRascgjtIHD5pk4gbYyjH1Gh4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Lb7G6KJOuVI+kUS5VeuS6t8oipIgTmfOcymXNrj7Jk00e/iDS5Lw+4b/K42z8feMUi NdGN7LGfU7qIkNvE4GuEqGCD2Z6QUTGOQoFSrLaHrZMXT5wfbWYRi283VwmhT7MEqpD7 fQuEdMwha9VWek/MxZksA7zHLx7tGi0B1uiBI= Received: by 10.223.113.68 with SMTP id z4mr1503964fap.72.1235609516019; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm233252nfh.46.2009.02.25.16.51.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:51:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:51:45 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi function (Was: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives) Message-ID: <20090226005145.658fc4bf@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <49A5E5C0.3020400@gentoo.org> References: <49A472E3.1010204@gentoo.org> <20090225124951.GD3506@hrair> <20090225230307.33c9f4f8@snowcone> <20090226000246.GK3506@hrair> <20090226001104.3cec09e5@snowmobile> <49A5E5C0.3020400@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/q6/x=IcZTJv5Az4lr+o1LoK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 13de65e9-e7ae-4fed-b1f4-85850d276cd2 X-Archives-Hash: 81cf37cf7d33a0234a015db98154d480 --Sig_/q6/x=IcZTJv5Az4lr+o1LoK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:43:44 -0100 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:02:46 -0800 > > Brian Harring wrote: > < snip a few arguments> >=20 > Ciaran and Brian, >=20 > please respect Pettery's request and move your discussion to the > GLEP55 thread or to another thread, but leave it out of this one. This was moved to another thread, as a casual glance at the subject would have told you. > please stop abusing other subscribers of the dev ml. > Ultimately everyone wants a resolution to this "issue" but have > potentially different ideas of the way to go about that. So different > ideas for a solution should be encouraged, not fought. > You're obviously free to argue your case and I'm not trying to silence > you, but by replying to every and single mail in quite a few cases in > a harsh tone, you're behaving like a "bully". Please stop that. One of the nice things about technical discussions is that it is entirely possible for one particular party to be entirely wrong. In this case, Brian is entirely wrong, and calling him on it is the correct thing to do. If you would prefer to see fewer emails from me, perhaps you should start telling people who post the same incorrect claims that have already been demonstrated to be false over and over again to stop it. One of the unfortunate tendencies the Council has shown in the past is to treat any unreplied-to objection as being legitimate and cause for an issue to be postponed, even if that issue has already been addressed earlier on. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/q6/x=IcZTJv5Az4lr+o1LoK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkml56QACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHIBwCgtT7B2Zsfe0OXUMWOiCTwHBJw SQkAn346ecqvjmMLaK63EaTv11/rOiMH =GCbp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/q6/x=IcZTJv5Az4lr+o1LoK--