From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcLlm-00059N-P3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:33:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0C76E0766; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f173.google.com (mail-ew0-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCF9E0766 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so51709ewy.34 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:33:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=Hfv4xUDw038YjtWoG9tJ61TVyq0K1Xe8Y4A2FNRkmsw=; b=Su7kwsk4GBV7WWXLvELeh5IRrzqp2WFgOTAlVI4oIOEPBVFIhVPWYyian/gXr4z1Lh My74YLg6W3JfXg/8mflh2yVgYFUN6JB4ZJjrIETDWfwnc8NYTjRxU9B55SWLIw0swpU8 lKOVyqTjEd9KhIVXRGWwu474ufR0U2dG8WsLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=pfa9/RdGoQhyaN5Iy5kKmEB+UsOjErXDlo/iOofdSGD3Yj2ytTb5Q5hB7nWZm+vMHc WDOIa6q+SwMguoycD1F2Y3MMwZ1iUvVnB8cR8bBRuIKrM1UYBypy2ZRC9931mPOUFWok 6JDn3ekbYRi6/qznZEVet/EZAbqDPs5dJRTZE= Received: by 10.210.120.17 with SMTP id s17mr49331ebc.72.1235576035903; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm2462430eyx.54.2009.02.25.07.33.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:33:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:33:47 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090225153347.3e9aaafa@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49A4B54E.4060202@gentoo.org> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <1234450419.20950.2.camel@localhost> <20090212160045.GB3642@comet> <20090212161644.GD3642@comet> <20090212162103.256b003f@snowcone> <20090212171055.GA3652@comet> <20090212172109.778fb268@snowcone> <20090212173743.GD3652@comet> <20090212180350.0d9a9df5@snowcone> <1235037961.13198.779.camel@localhost> <20090219125124.33eaa66c@snowcone> <1235077892.13198.1923.camel@localhost> <20090222171658.278ae167@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A1E1CB.1000806@gentoo.org> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <49A39CE7.4010201@gentoo.org> <20090224141912.0a666a17@snowcone> <49A41A8C.1060002@gentoo.org> <20090224161449.07bc580a@snowcone> <49A42B86.9010903@gentoo.org> <20090224182416.3db4f60f@snowcone> <49A4B54E.4060202@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/jEyw2J9L3fOP=XTerv.kFQG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: d28f008a-eb55-47e4-9f09-2fca14a5fa25 X-Archives-Hash: e422cfecd68601ca9f5a17d7b135fe62 --Sig_/jEyw2J9L3fOP=XTerv.kFQG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:04:46 +0100 Luca Barbato wrote: > given that the simplest thing is hacking ebuild.sh and extract eapi > with a simple C program (you can use pcre or ragel if you want) > exactly before the ebuild source: That you're bringing ebuild.sh into this shows you still haven't worked out how the process works. There is no need to use ebuild.sh (which is a very good thing, because launching bash is slooooooooooooow) when there's valid metadata. > > So you have patches for Portage? Please show them. >=20 > Up there what's enough to check the viability for the solution. No, it's completely wrong. ebuild.sh has nothing to do with this. > >> unknown isn't unsupported? > >=20 > > Huh? Please explain what you mean. >=20 > mv cat/pkg-version.ebuild cat/pkg-version_foo.ebuild >=20 > emerge -vp pkg >=20 > portage will warn about not knowing pkg-version_foo and will ignore > it. Yes, it will warn noisily. This is unacceptable, since stable users will have months and months of noise when new rules come along. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/jEyw2J9L3fOP=XTerv.kFQG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmlZN4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFbbgCfTj/m2rixqM/Vt8fRhLh78sxn O/4AoOc4RcCz8v7Ixkq5cIIjWPEtcF4U =3DPZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jEyw2J9L3fOP=XTerv.kFQG--