From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcLgO-0004Tn-Vc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:28:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE9E6E077D; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f171.google.com (mail-bw0-f171.google.com [209.85.218.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6950BE077D for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so29661bwz.34 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:28:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=1260nQgLm2hpo41qnrcGT2B6DwPGNHMtJ9clERsBvKw=; b=YjWpqFUnMCXvOD2DRz66q8KohRjK4WY7CFE/19+P+ZxN8/xiHG0/xzqi9z4OD/nSS8 f4gTrVGEnsRkZSCztFtvS0BdQ2RdMUW58b4d/LnQus8s5n320PNmAZXqMNvdHaO2mxX2 P58/GH/mWnsqsVl1jdFo8IKhL4SaY5DIlhjsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=aEOKckoY2ySGBavv+sOdjZ2+P1wNwwLL2NmLHgrXPYYq0q+4wpVRfRZTUerWwhKn/F 8L7WX4jv4i35+vv5Z0UFm61Aar7MemG+vrGcZMDrz98ek4I8FM02rGB9/MaO/PgV++TM IODikZyzaHN1bGjIGLMk46panS5qYZZ22u+bI= Received: by 10.223.112.130 with SMTP id w2mr1018574fap.65.1235575698577; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm520580eyx.44.2009.02.25.07.28.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:28:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:28:11 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090225152811.34ab216a@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <1235543681.5861.10.camel@neuromancer> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <20090212160045.GB3642@comet> <20090212161644.GD3642@comet> <20090212162103.256b003f@snowcone> <20090212171055.GA3652@comet> <20090212172109.778fb268@snowcone> <20090212173743.GD3652@comet> <20090212180350.0d9a9df5@snowcone> <1235037961.13198.779.camel@localhost> <20090219125124.33eaa66c@snowcone> <1235077892.13198.1923.camel@localhost> <20090222171658.278ae167@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A1E1CB.1000806@gentoo.org> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <49A39CE7.4010201@gentoo.org> <49A3AAA1.6080207@gentoo.org> <49A3B947.2020907@gentoo.org> <49A3D0F6.6080307@gentoo.org> <49A41656.7020100@gentoo.org> <20090224155654.602f6c88@snowcone> <49A455BD.900@gentoo.org> <20090224202525.01016056@snowcone> <49A46AA9.9050805@gentoo.org> <20090224214850.6689d986@snowcone> <49A4793B.8030200@gentoo.org> <20090224225850.179814b6@snowcone> <1235543681.5861.10.camel@neuromancer> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/f+zjJh5V8xjka.v_/BGb/oa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 001bf52d-a2bb-4c3b-9609-4a82de4b2cb6 X-Archives-Hash: c00967b14d9ecbd1558e73b97cf29c00 --Sig_/f+zjJh5V8xjka.v_/BGb/oa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:34:41 +0100 Tiziano M=C3=BCller wrote: > Well, you could theoretical consider everything in the cache valid > within the current scope, find the eapi within the cache or the ebuild > and then reconsider things. You can't even do that, because new EAPIs might change how cache entries are validated. An ID might have been moved to a new EAPI using some new EAPI thing (such as changing how inherit works) that doesn't end up altering mtimes in a way that can be caught. > Would it be possible to change the cache-format with with G55? > Meaning: Have the current cache-format for the current *.ebuild and > another for *.ebuild-N (where I mean by cache-format the contents of > the cache-files)? If you have GLEP 55 you don't need it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/f+zjJh5V8xjka.v_/BGb/oa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmlY44ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhF0oACgnGELjza1QaQrxTLdFgaP+2uj ++AAniAVGDPnbUMlVP9YubbCUNNVCktP =wjqZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/f+zjJh5V8xjka.v_/BGb/oa--