From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34571-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1LcDxR-0001Vz-1r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:13:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADE4AE04D2; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFCCE04D2 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-98-246-79-112.hsd1.or.comcast.net [98.246.79.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7166428D for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:12:35 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26 Message-ID: <20090225071235.GA3923@comet> References: <20090223072648.GK12339@hermes> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090223072648.GK12339@hermes> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 5c6f8e67-13e8-44fb-9dba-40ec70095bbf X-Archives-Hash: b3ae2dcfe00504d0d5f8ce9abb196176 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23:26 Sun 22 Feb , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th=20 > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @=20 > irc.freenode.net) ! >=20 > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote=20 > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev=20 > list to see. Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so it's=20 a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, cardoe,=20 dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that they've=20 taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere! Open council spot ----------------- leio is next on the list. He's willing to join the council. A few of us=20 already voted to confirm him on-list, and we're waiting on the others. Goal: Vote to confirm him, if necessary. GLEP 55 / bash version ---------------------- Crazy amounts of discussion on-list. Cardoe & Tiziano, you took=20 responsibility for this -- can you sum up the current state of things?=20 Pending something better, here's what I'd like to see happen on-list (or=20 on the wiki, whatever) before the meeting: Goal: Come up with 3 things: 1) Agreement that this is a problem we need to solve now; 2) Come up with a list of potential implementations; 3) Come up with pros & cons for each. At that point, we should have enough information to at least rank them=20 and decide out whether the top-ranked one has the right approach. We=20 should then clearly define any problems with it and suggest=20 improvements. GLEP 54: handling code from SCMs better --------------------------------------- Some discussion on list. Luca, can you sum up the state of things? PMS compliance in Gentoo-hosted trees besides gentoo-x86 -------------------------------------------------------- ferringb requested this. We need some discussion on-list before we talk=20 about it during a meeting, so please chip in and reply to his post. Suggestions are welcome, as are any summaries from our new secretary. =3D) --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmk72MACgkQXVaO67S1rtubBgCfW9w0znyVe33bscoCdOShXARr 9/EAoIV92kTvAGGGdyoeP5sCOfl+uAw2 =kwM+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--