From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc59A-0004pu-R9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:49:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B71E9E0506; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63931E0506 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so158196fga.14 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:48:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=wyjMWxCAkIcCh3n5WEEK0sojJ0/8GsRurs53/JXKVbo=; b=KWed6ki/ShxFj2mbqj2C1GXvn9yuFfacmpq6cWgauoKA8WxDaMS48QC1tj+yaZRP5h boA22gVjFxpbSpYx/mPFkbfQggnP9V44ChjvTdFTFziiTW6DJoJGaTY+pjdLysjunERU BUXCVcexVcqveiOrEI2MPlac35pJ3xnH8REIc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=b/bScC1Sk12B8gNWbDvSkI8pqGvloYCyJ5UzysAiABHhsmglGZHHCgp3W6dxwJR7B9 MIguX4FGZyHDrkMdfLpU3aCqCAVKbnfVqGj6HWr0Ft/szaIqHyNGUiLFBlJeeQ5Jdt5C caFLM0HOZGv8dYpFat5NX2VYip9gfWE/rTHI0= Received: by 10.86.49.13 with SMTP id w13mr28897fgw.65.1235512137679; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm20280735ugf.14.2009.02.24.13.48.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:48:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:48:50 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090224214850.6689d986@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49A46AA9.9050805@gentoo.org> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <1234450419.20950.2.camel@localhost> <20090212160045.GB3642@comet> <20090212161644.GD3642@comet> <20090212162103.256b003f@snowcone> <20090212171055.GA3652@comet> <20090212172109.778fb268@snowcone> <20090212173743.GD3652@comet> <20090212180350.0d9a9df5@snowcone> <1235037961.13198.779.camel@localhost> <20090219125124.33eaa66c@snowcone> <1235077892.13198.1923.camel@localhost> <20090222171658.278ae167@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A1E1CB.1000806@gentoo.org> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <49A39CE7.4010201@gentoo.org> <49A3AAA1.6080207@gentoo.org> <49A3B947.2020907@gentoo.org> <49A3D0F6.6080307@gentoo.org> <49A41656.7020100@gentoo.org> <20090224155654.602f6c88@snowcone> <49A455BD.900@gentoo.org> <20090224202525.01016056@snowcone> <49A46AA9.9050805@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/0aEiufK_4gZRpByf2v2/OuM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 2654b40c-8e14-4347-b789-c47ebbc1c79a X-Archives-Hash: 7265693d9de9e61e797eb5ee1734fc5c --Sig_/0aEiufK_4gZRpByf2v2/OuM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:46:17 +0100 Luca Barbato wrote: > > It means opening a file that would otherwise not be opened at all. > > And if the EAPI is in the file, you have to fish inside that file > > to pull it out before you can work out whether the cache entry that > > might contain the EAPI already is valid. >=20 > Keeping in mind that: > - if the cache is present you won't do it (so normal users aren't > touched) > - you just need a way to upgrade portage and nothing else. Not true. You don't know whether the cache is valid until you know what the EAPI is. > You: > - have to open them on regen, no matter what (you are adding it to > portage) > - the cache entry has already the eapi value so there it is. Can't use the cache until you know what the EAPI is. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/0aEiufK_4gZRpByf2v2/OuM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmka0QACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGClwCgq7uGGMu2tbYaovLZkt0kGqH9 65cAnRXs14B1mM9L1fFhLYQEcJeuQi3Q =4NDR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0aEiufK_4gZRpByf2v2/OuM--