From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc0Sn-0000hx-AI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20E78E04C1; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.147]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A2FE04CA for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so1006443qwj.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=ISjix6ztiWIPGu95Ztmge8/2HUUqJAuRVIVGg/K3JGk=; b=Kze3yNCzm/Nr5EOiGVsvIWd9gBavjiguvbqQjam2ufLQacVyFjmBoLFax7VDxVv/QB pfyI15fcoSbTLg7Fk8jUMUfbX0uHDB+g//2znBfEEtYcduwIpaH0Mz1KYQ0jDjri+vbl JVhSJgXtiuGSJdvFcQyNZfThpcC5Wdv6i73N4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ZO3NfoHY0Kktd4fZZgK7p19Vcq0ohyi6XLW1/a0K6g22pqsLfHR1eKJ/rpV77//vkJ wwXpj3fM9ubz/L1vda4vpIA/t/RDEeJJle3t/o9zZo0aLD4NyVhrPc5dDzsflr5aq7/A o71J4XLMHwCyq3BU0LU6rSfa8gDkx9oV+5KHQ= Received: by 10.224.15.10 with SMTP id i10mr22879qaa.6.1235494135267; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x37sm9191338ugc.15.2009.02.24.08.48.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:48 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090224164848.3c60d850@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org> <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A41D3F.4010706@gentoo.org> <20090224162341.149c49a7@snowcone> <20090224163726.781bba19@snowcone> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/FJ/FsZZgDPI+ISWVYtJwsug"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: dce6fa95-3f67-4947-8a53-3029a4be0ada X-Archives-Hash: a160c5faed45912c47b66bf0aaee62a2 --Sig_/FJ/FsZZgDPI+ISWVYtJwsug Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:42:44 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800 > > Alec Warner wrote: > >> Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it > >> covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too; > >> sometimes requirements get dropped. > > > > We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no > > need to compromise here. >=20 > Two years to argue and implement a solution certainly shouts > "compromise" to me. Strange. To me it shouts "leadership problem". --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/FJ/FsZZgDPI+ISWVYtJwsug Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAkmkJPIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEHQwCeOTEt4x6RRmqnjHgTiN2wT3V3 OgkAmLNsh3Rn9m2p8Eyo9nrg6K1LE/s= =IQ+f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FJ/FsZZgDPI+ISWVYtJwsug--