From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc0SD-0008Ou-Ru for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC0C5E047C; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.144]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C50E047C for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so1006199qwj.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=Qx4xt7gFArcgAYAUNhWzJqoqhBwBAJq2k5ZxWHIIHxg=; b=r8SPzh5wKolHf86RiIq4Gn9/II4GB8aQ3RdHSva0BFnaOwJB7ljqLv16OoFGuRPMYn 1UuiED7KrXKRmQljC17kTJOm903AaLGzt1pfZc8DDBJ1uuzHUO2qDKcEY336mPomSgnj nvTnCv2xOonKuF+XoKYzxR13lgbE6rkFn7Hno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=rNZEyS0qCCcpZ3fgdt2cg8z3/EDd6+7+EVQNrMe/KuNW5MA1NM9CMYoGYz978DuvP+ VgEP0k1BQpIen8e8AHiJw0ZwSC1CmsIwsYqn+8CJCNpFyG+9X31Zu8lCTHY6jHFI05Hd y835LYxG1++OTvMn1y6If53wWk97WaYvPOYfw= Received: by 10.224.36.202 with SMTP id u10mr31103qad.123.1235494100118; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i39sm19454156ugd.32.2009.02.24.08.48.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:48:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:12 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090224164812.3795d777@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49A42438.7080002@gentoo.org> References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <20090219125124.33eaa66c@snowcone> <1235077892.13198.1923.camel@localhost> <20090222171658.278ae167@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> <49A1E1CB.1000806@gentoo.org> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <1235378286.31617.6.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org> <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A41D3F.4010706@gentoo.org> <20090224162128.02c69851@snowcone> <49A42438.7080002@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/m76KxQKBbPmBPd0CTdqf6r4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4b99f0e3-3a38-4056-be0c-274de5eb4deb X-Archives-Hash: e5362e85f556767699c2e0f33deda9cd --Sig_/m76KxQKBbPmBPd0CTdqf6r4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:45:44 -0700 Joe Peterson wrote: > > Then why don't you come up with a viable solution? >=20 > I already have - look back at my posts; very similar to Rich0's idea. No, I said viable. > And I tire of the argument that if one doesn't have a perfect solution > now, we should adopt a half-brained one. The point of this is to spur > discussion to come up with a better solution. We have a perfect solution. > > For the same reason they're willing to accept the package name and > > version in the filename. >=20 > The fact that you think this is the same thing as having the EAPI in > the filename is odd. PN and PV are metadata, same as EAPI. > > "If you paint the bikeshed, I shall throw my toys out of the pram > > and run off crying.". > >=20 > > Why don't you propose a viable alternative instead of making > > threats? >=20 > Not a threat. And this will be my last post on the topic. I will not > take your bate and continue to argue, creating more noise on this > list - I've expressed how I feel. This isn't about how you feel. It's about what you rationally think, based upon a full understanding of the issues at hand. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/m76KxQKBbPmBPd0CTdqf6r4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmkJM8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFZEgCdEF4SyYRWy0ptop8vzNLNyCkj qBcAoMf9lcb+wnuu8g43MNJ9IR59Zvtr =Aarj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/m76KxQKBbPmBPd0CTdqf6r4--