From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc0Ho-0002hj-RA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:37:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AC97E0484; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.144]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28134E0484 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so1001988qwj.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:37:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=+4razoTlS+DUIJWPRTbxBSz1obhmaRUZC9KQQGpaTFg=; b=Ly+NVWFdC28Y9vM64hrlTC9p9mkI5L7JaVTHT2iJEFMQMm/Nnbh4aom5FrP/pdtydn ZCRsmbeV1rBro6v6gwtDzLGA1rJY+uzR702PujqzIUHS/vjsyRu9PtAPrpWnAWS/rC6K PFsO6M0zVtNEzp9+hMFmtDmT4IjI/S1Gjw5Ng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=tRsBfhZmJ17KKwiKFuVLRt9sYE4kw8DJ2FmSJVjezx/9+s64hNLXC7GEc1waFIEx4y C2hznoutuyLH0zd3Xhf2xCBi74/kNkXW18Fz7s1P+F0NcTzyn/blE9IRVdPzKBaBxz2z JyfuZj69Tbc9GDyfnnIJBIvPY/qnL4JZ1p3AA= Received: by 10.224.67.10 with SMTP id p10mr8316708qai.267.1235493454539; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k1sm19440682ugf.55.2009.02.24.08.37.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:37:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:37:26 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090224163726.781bba19@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <1235378286.31617.6.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org> <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A41D3F.4010706@gentoo.org> <20090224162341.149c49a7@snowcone> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/tWaGnG1yMV90CJIzo3DXz9C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 420e3ff2-0845-4905-ae32-b8cc8ce7aa6b X-Archives-Hash: 0540b1028fc87562ded17988b6af88cb --Sig_/tWaGnG1yMV90CJIzo3DXz9C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it > covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too; > sometimes requirements get dropped. We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no need to compromise here. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/tWaGnG1yMV90CJIzo3DXz9C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmkIkkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEFOwCfdXO9OLcnj3Z4XVsR54X+ZwZN RM8An3xLAPm9OFtzAwjATan4Xj+JnR4H =Ir4B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tWaGnG1yMV90CJIzo3DXz9C--