From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lc04X-0003Di-3l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:23:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5DFDE0462; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.150]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E20E0462 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so996170qwj.10 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=Ah9vk+aL9eysYUr2UslEM1rj+6ng6iLAFRoJSmk5hFU=; b=fnLQVfdj7iDA+Z1zXJzY+mZFdhZ5YNx2V9TCUYodfcdOm2D35NN+eZ+xEW2KtI52w9 XHuF9UM6nuZ9SnOkKbtaD0UUENEdU/XzA+UlcPG6iS5BQqaFFkPyo3z9Drs67VWM0b7/ dJNvSCMLzAh1YbV1JqehkOLK2QnX1n6jEk9YE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=dHswrQfm9k9n4apfbgb5GRw5BBPahgCU+HMeDkORMD92GVAuHYhFFdpTJ/sQZNYDcj jY5Nhhta3eJZneLKElb8pIvUo+mFd+bhMKumZM8SkjCOpt7EAnfL0sWAO8N4bK7USe+G 7IttWfOeGWqsjtZBIHIQSzI2I6tJf8O7lia5E= Received: by 10.224.45.204 with SMTP id g12mr8308485qaf.172.1235492630888; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 40sm19406647uge.25.2009.02.24.08.23.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:23:41 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090224162341.149c49a7@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <49A1E1CB.1000806@gentoo.org> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <1235378286.31617.6.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org> <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A41D3F.4010706@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/QJKr2s=q61UN=tUz2/yGOpT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 261f385a-7b41-4bb2-a324-42ed7b3b3810 X-Archives-Hash: 0a6506cb3fb1a74a944aaec8fe200524 --Sig_/QJKr2s=q61UN=tUz2/yGOpT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:21:25 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > Somewhat ironically, had everyone been less stubborn last year when > discussing this topic we could have embedded the EAPI in line X of the > ebuild in 2008 and be using it now; instead of still discussing it. ...and we wouldn't be able to change the version rules, and we would be suffering a substantial performance hit. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/QJKr2s=q61UN=tUz2/yGOpT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmkHxEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEi2wCgg4yfBivcQCAyAThAlW50n9Qr BQcAoJ7tPr8/X8ivfFPls+0AitASmmpL =L4SG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QJKr2s=q61UN=tUz2/yGOpT--