From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lbg9W-0004iL-Dd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 304CCE04C7; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f161.google.com (mail-fx0-f161.google.com [209.85.220.161]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA51E04C7 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2052880fxm.10 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:07:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=84Jz/Y7AWtmKF08UOjqydlzcly/ZTyRiYa1F5I3ZVK4=; b=VSN/zdBtWlXNSi2Xxd/3tFrzgx8k/DGAqphlB/5wWaZrHNLenlDgG8TCNWWK6aI2Xw hVhJxPDfseasG6QIN511a78OXwt3mesZdxKpiL1q0/DKvu4JhGNiA0znIb0gHsSCedK+ UnPYwtJgo5AeauOMDLxrPamUQ3AaAFCs7EFu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=KIaX6b6QF4jLIWicGG+zrWhTrIrOz+WhuLA9IdH5V75wTygNglsMyCTzOdAxr2FfER rcS6yxsx/ZBQVCRfo8sJnqVx/botU6UK8DTW98cfdEwCJ8HWP8MStZ9t4XHw/uJa2mmv k4WPfMFhUSUf/A+a3TPdpW4gk0784p1n7D738= Received: by 10.103.175.9 with SMTP id c9mr3628785mup.3.1235416059911; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm8123267ugf.56.2009.02.23.11.07.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:07:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:31 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) Message-ID: <20090223190731.22f47fbd@snowcone> In-Reply-To: References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost> <20090222234800.29d64b8d@snowcone> <49A206A7.3050604@gentoo.org> <1235378286.31617.6.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org> <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch> <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A2C40D.3060601@gentoo.org> <20090223155320.4b9f16fd@snowcone> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/VSSkJ.RCuUJ5t0QjD8teua4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e4771a69-848e-47f4-97fd-870e80367cef X-Archives-Hash: b7ebcba3c73096c241d2c0f165c205d7 --Sig_/VSSkJ.RCuUJ5t0QjD8teua4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:02:17 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > > In foo.eclass: > > > > EAPI=3D"3" >=20 > This is not legal, the devmanual[1] explicitly states that it is not > legal to set EAPI in an eclass. That's purely a QA thing, and it only applies to repositories that follow Gentoo's QA rules. It's in the same category as rules about what indenting style to use, not rules about how variables are formatted. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/VSSkJ.RCuUJ5t0QjD8teua4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmi8/UACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHM7QCgo4+xBIU3xqdFdDLcaECpNmps PkcAn0IzlWmKILY+15HjbnRM4dfVYbTn =GMzo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VSSkJ.RCuUJ5t0QjD8teua4--