From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LbNrC-0007G1-DE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:35:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A57A7E03F4; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B16E03F4 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f054051154.adsl.alicedsl.de (f054051154.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.51.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2798B6B26 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:35:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for next bugday: Mass use deps migration Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:35:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <499EE087.1030802@gentoo.org> <200902222234.25275.carlo@gentoo.org> <49A1CA6D.5050707@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <49A1CA6D.5050707@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5243618.0nJsJJUgn9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200902230035.26845.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ff7f8968-206d-4377-a633-cfe1a3657bdc X-Archives-Hash: bbe755def0faf17e2298ebdabad5a625 --nextPart5243618.0nJsJJUgn9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Even if the eclasses are not EAPI 2 ready you can work > around it in the ebuild by for example those empty functions. This is fine with me, when you care for said packages and their eclasses an= d=20 know for sure such hacks have a very limited lifetime. Otherwise it's likel= y=20 to rot in the repository for ages. Carsten --nextPart5243618.0nJsJJUgn9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmh4T4ACgkQVwbzmvGLSW/6vwCfbfOOHUrONLbWnFvjj+OyE6Fu 5LUAn1JLqFM7RvKF1MXEDLNqin2mQfrv =+aTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5243618.0nJsJJUgn9--